H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Stefano Travaglia vs Simone Bolelli H2H: 0-1
Simone Bolelli holds a 1–0 lead over Stefano Travaglia in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2014 Rome Masters second round 3-6 7-5 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2014* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Simone Bolelli | 3-6 7-5 7-6(5) | Stefano Travaglia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefano Travaglia | #150 | #60 | 1,039 | 1,806 | 29 | 56 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefano Travaglia | Simone Bolelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #134 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #74 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #310 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2026 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |