H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Stefano Travaglia vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0
Stefano Travaglia holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefano Travaglia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stefano Travaglia won the 2019 Umag third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2019* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Stefano Travaglia | 6-3 6-2 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefano Travaglia | #150 | #60 | 1,039 | 1,806 | 29 | 56 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefano Travaglia | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #134 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #74 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #310 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2026 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |