H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Stan Wawrinka H2H: 0-1
Stan Wawrinka holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanos Tsitsipas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stan Wawrinka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2019 Roland Garros fourth round 7-6(6) 5-7 6-4 3-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Greece
Age 27
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Switzerland
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 7-6(6) 5-7 6-4 3-6 8-6 | Stefanos Tsitsipas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | #85 | #3 | 8,350 | 2,235 | 354 | 188 | 65.3% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 12 |
| Stan Wawrinka | #117 | #3 | 6,865 | 2,268 | 564 | 371 | 60.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefanos Tsitsipas | Stan Wawrinka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2017 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #91 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #15 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #6 | 2,116 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #6 | 2,074 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #30 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2021 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #4 | 2,039 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2022 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #4 | 2,048 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #13 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #11 | 1,941 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 | 2011 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,915 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #85 | 1,806 | 0 | 12 | 2012 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #4 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #4 | 2,199 | 2 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,129 | 3 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,120 | 3 | 16 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,946 | 3 | 16 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #16 | 2,021 | 3 | 16 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #18 | 2,001 | 3 | 16 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,916 | 3 | 16 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,824 | 3 | 16 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,782 | 3 | 16 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #161 | 1,714 | 3 | 16 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #157 | 1,640 | 3 | 16 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,632 | 3 | 16 |