H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Stephen Noteboom vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-0

Stephen Noteboom holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephen Noteboom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephen Noteboom won the 1995 Japan Open round of 64 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stephen Noteboom
NED Age 57 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stephen Noteboom #579 6-3 6-1 Martin Damm Sr Match data Apr 12, 1995* R64 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stephen Noteboom #874 #333 79 1,524 1 2 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Stephen Noteboom Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1995 1–1 50.0% #571 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 0–1 0.0% #853 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Stephen Noteboom Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Stephen Noteboom Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1995 1508 106.3 -0.84 -1.52 0.873 46.7% — — — 50.0% +1.00 — 0–1 — +0.13 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1996 1499 103.7 -0.32 -3.12 1.123 50.5% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.07 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.26
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.61
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.27
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) — +1.26
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) — +0.62
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.31
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.57
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 1524 105.0 -0.58 -2.32 0.980 48.6% — — — 42.9% +0.28 0–1 0–2 — +2.00 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.