H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
S. Campbell vs M. Petchey H2H: 1-1
S. Campbell and M. Petchey are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, M. Petchey leads 1–0 on carpet, while S. Campbell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, M. Petchey won the 1996 Shanghai third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1996* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | M. Petchey | 6-4 6-4 | S. Campbell | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1995* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | S. Campbell | 6-4 6-1 | M. Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Campbell | #1,351 | #78 | 593 | 1,724 | 32 | 54 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M. Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | S. Campbell | M. Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #315 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #128 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #102 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #586 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |