H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Steve Darcis vs Dustin Brown H2H: 0-1
Dustin Brown holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dustin Brown leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dustin Brown won the 2016 Montpellier third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JAM
Age 41
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2016* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dustin Brown | 7-5 7-5 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dustin Brown | #1,058 | #64 | 778 | 1,903 | 61 | 96 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steve Darcis | Dustin Brown | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #167 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #72 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |