H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Steve Darcis vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 3-0
Steve Darcis holds a 3–0 lead over Malek Jaziri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Steve Darcis leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2019 Pune quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2019* | Pune | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Steve Darcis | 7-5 6-2 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2015* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 2-6 7-5 7-5 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 3-6 6-1 6-1 6-1 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Malek Jaziri | #1,645 | #42 | 1,042 | 1,843 | 83 | 134 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steve Darcis | Malek Jaziri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #98 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #45 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #201 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #312 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #433 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1645 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |