H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Steve Darcis vs Paul Capdeville H2H: 1-0

Steve Darcis holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Capdeville in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2009 Queen's Club Championships first round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Darcis
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Paul Capdeville
CHI Age 43 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Darcis #73 3-6 6-3 6-4 Paul Capdeville #84 Match data Jun 10, 2009* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,852 94 124 43.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Paul Capdeville #1,186 #76 960 1,730 36 67 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Darcis Paul Capdeville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #455 1,484 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #305 1,456 0 0
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #148 1,535 0 0
23 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1 2006 6–11 35.3% #149 1,530 0 0
24 2008 20–20 50.0% #61 1,761 0 2 2007 12–12 50.0% #102 1,700 0 0
25 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,544 0 2 2008 6–13 31.6% #111 1,631 0 0
26 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,678 0 2 2009 8–14 36.4% #129 1,568 0 0
27 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,794 0 2 2010 1–1 50.0% #165 1,482 0 0
28 2012 19–18 51.4% #93 1,785 0 2 2011 0–7 0.0% #131 1,528 0 0
29 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,717 0 2 2012 1–5 16.7% #166 1,525 0 0
30 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,706 0 2 2013 1–1 50.0% #154 1,592 0 0
31 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,738 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,773 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,807 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Darcis Paul Capdeville
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2008 10 9 19 52.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2009 1 10 11 9.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2011 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 12 10 22 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 66 118 44.1% 24 38 62 38.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — 21 35 56 37.5% 13 25 38 34.2% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 209/218 of Steve Darcis's and 100/103 of Paul Capdeville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Steve Darcis Paul Capdeville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 4.0 11.0 51.9% 55.0% 35.1% 30.0% 50.0% 45.5% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 3.0 1.0 68.8% 56.8% 45.0% 55.6% 100.0% 53.1% 32.2%
22 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.8% 60.5% 59.5% 75.0% — 60.0% 24.5% 2005 2/2 8.0 2.5 56.5% 66.8% 49.9% 52.3% 34.9% 59.4% 37.6%
23 2007 8/8 4.4 1.9 56.6% 74.9% 49.9% 48.9% 42.3% 64.3% 41.9% 2006 17/17 4.0 2.8 57.6% 68.6% 46.2% 49.6% 60.0% 59.2% 34.6%
24 2008 39/40 4.9 1.9 60.0% 69.3% 51.1% 57.2% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0% 2007 22/24 4.7 3.2 60.9% 66.5% 46.2% 54.8% 38.2% 58.7% 36.8%
25 2009 22/23 4.5 2.3 57.6% 71.8% 50.5% 57.3% 37.5% 62.8% 34.1% 2008 19/19 3.6 2.4 61.7% 64.6% 47.0% 49.4% 39.9% 58.1% 37.9%
26 2010 10/10 3.2 1.9 60.1% 66.2% 50.4% 55.2% 46.3% 59.9% 35.6% 2009 22/22 3.7 2.8 62.4% 67.7% 49.5% 43.7% 36.4% 60.8% 35.7%
27 2011 13/13 5.2 3.8 58.6% 68.5% 48.8% 53.9% 44.7% 60.0% 37.3% 2010 2/2 2.5 4.5 64.5% 70.7% 43.9% 58.3% 44.4% 61.7% 42.8%
28 2012 33/37 4.1 1.3 63.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.0% 41.1% 62.7% 37.1% 2011 6/7 4.0 4.0 61.4% 60.6% 40.9% 54.8% 67.5% 53.4% 36.9%
29 2013 8/9 4.0 2.6 62.5% 69.4% 52.7% 51.2% 30.6% 62.7% 33.5% 2012 6/6 4.0 4.2 60.2% 66.1% 48.1% 53.3% 43.9% 58.8% 34.9%
30 2014 1/1 9.0 6.0 61.3% 67.0% 58.5% 68.8% 46.2% 63.7% 37.9% 2013 2/2 7.5 2.0 66.2% 74.8% 54.7% 68.8% 75.0% 68.0% 39.3%
31 2015 18/19 2.6 2.3 62.3% 64.5% 50.0% 64.6% 38.6% 59.5% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 8/8 4.5 4.3 54.5% 71.3% 52.0% 52.8% 38.9% 62.4% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 33/34 3.3 1.5 61.7% 67.8% 46.8% 54.4% 44.9% 58.8% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 15/15 3.6 1.9 62.3% 66.1% 47.3% 62.1% 36.9% 58.5% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209/218 4.1 2.1 60.6% 68.7% 50.0% 56.7% 40.9% 61.1% 35.9% — 100/103 4.1 3.1 60.9% 66.4% 47.0% 50.4% 45.5% 58.9% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Darcis Paul Capdeville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1484 96.4 -3.13 -3.45 0.570 38.4% — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.20
21 2005 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1456 96.0 -3.44 -1.82 0.687 43.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.22
22 2006 1472 94.9 -4.72 -4.47 0.613 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 2005 1536 113.6 +0.23 +0.69 0.926 49.3% — — — 42.9% 0.00 — — — -0.12
23 2007 1667 133.9 +1.36 +2.37 1.174 53.0% — +39 — 66.7% +1.00 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.67 2006 1531 116.6 -3.29 -0.67 0.848 47.6% +35 -36 — 41.9% -0.61 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.26
24 2008 1761 135.5 -1.36 -0.31 0.939 49.3% -35 -44 -175 50.0% -0.07 6–4 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.16 2007 1700 124.3 -3.60 +0.19 0.892 48.1% +27 -144 — 44.3% -0.18 5–1 (83%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.51
25 2009 1545 116.6 -1.07 -1.53 0.918 48.7% +10 +55 +98 24.1% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.42 2008 1631 119.8 -3.41 +0.96 0.904 47.9% +14 -7 — 42.0% -0.72 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.55
26 2010 1678 128.9 -1.59 -0.51 0.889 48.2% +4 -43 — 52.6% +0.26 0–1 — — -0.11 2009 1568 123.0 -2.11 -1.83 0.911 47.7% +56 +29 -95 42.9% -0.45 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.80
27 2011 1795 125.8 -2.07 -0.57 0.934 48.6% -43 -55 — 47.4% -0.03 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.14 2010 1482 105.1 -0.04 +0.28 1.119 52.2% — — — 50.0% +0.83 1–1 — — +0.15
28 2012 1786 143.8 -0.59 +0.30 0.994 50.0% -43 -40 -50 54.4% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 16–3 (84%) — -2.70 2011 1529 112.0 -3.82 -1.53 0.792 45.7% -11 +105 — 17.6% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.02
29 2013 1717 114.5 -0.61 -0.45 0.898 48.1% -62 — +57 33.3% -1.05 0–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.52 2012 1525 114.2 -3.63 -1.30 0.848 47.1% -24 +106 — 33.3% -0.93 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.19
30 2014 1706 110.7 +1.34 +0.22 1.043 51.1% — — — 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.14 2013 1592 118.4 -0.58 +2.10 1.229 53.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.18
31 2015 1739 139.6 -2.44 0.00 0.871 47.8% +50 -47 — 43.2% -0.60 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.13 2014 1583 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1773 129.3 -0.69 +1.36 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 40.7% -0.33 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1807 136.2 -3.10 +0.27 0.897 47.9% +17 -72 -137 48.1% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1669 114.6 -4.04 -3.13 0.764 45.3% +41 — +47 32.4% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1648 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.3 -1.67 -0.31 0.923 48.7% -5 -28 -35 45.2% -0.33 29–29 (50%) 46–35 (57%) 105.6 -2.32 — 1731 121.9 -2.98 -0.45 0.885 47.7% +24 +3 -95 40.3% -0.61 12–25 (32%) 16–17 (48%) 94.8 +1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.