H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Steve Darcis vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 1-0

Steve Darcis holds a 1–0 lead over Tatsuma Ito in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2015 Montpellier Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Darcis
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tatsuma Ito
JPN Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Darcis #125 6-2 6-2 Tatsuma Ito #87 Match data Feb 5, 2015* R32 Montpellier Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,852 94 124 43.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Tatsuma Ito #1,822 #60 725 1,726 28 57 32.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Darcis Tatsuma Ito
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #313 1,460 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #210 1,483 0 0
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #183 1,491 0 0
23 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1 2011 2–4 33.3% #122 1,513 0 0
24 2008 20–20 50.0% #61 1,761 0 2 2012 9–13 40.9% #79 1,634 0 0
25 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,544 0 2 2013 2–9 18.2% #155 1,617 0 0
26 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,678 0 2 2014 3–5 37.5% #93 1,660 0 0
27 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,794 0 2 2015 8–11 42.1% #119 1,677 0 0
28 2012 19–18 51.4% #93 1,785 0 2 2016 3–4 42.9% #171 1,671 0 0
29 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,717 0 2 2017 0–2 0.0% #153 1,625 0 0
30 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,706 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #148 1,590 0 0
31 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,738 0 2 2019 0–3 0.0% #147 1,586 0 0
32 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,773 0 2 2020 1–1 50.0% #186 1,583 0 0
33 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,807 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Darcis Tatsuma Ito
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 10 9 19 52.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2009 1 10 11 9.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2011 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 12 10 22 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 66 118 44.1% 24 38 62 38.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — 19 41 60 31.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 209/218 of Steve Darcis's and 84/85 of Tatsuma Ito's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Steve Darcis Tatsuma Ito
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 2.0 4.0 61.5% 43.8% 45.0% 28.6% 20.0% 44.2% 37.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 3.5 3.0 55.7% 63.5% 30.4% 29.8% 75.0% 48.9% 33.3%
22 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.8% 60.5% 59.5% 75.0% — 60.0% 24.5% 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 49.2% 63.3% 48.4% 57.1% 33.3% 55.7% 25.5%
23 2007 8/8 4.4 1.9 56.6% 74.9% 49.9% 48.9% 42.3% 64.3% 41.9% 2011 6/6 3.5 3.7 55.2% 63.9% 48.4% 54.0% 24.4% 57.2% 28.9%
24 2008 39/40 4.9 1.9 60.0% 69.3% 51.1% 57.2% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0% 2012 21/22 4.0 3.5 56.3% 66.6% 50.9% 54.8% 40.0% 59.6% 36.5%
25 2009 22/23 4.5 2.3 57.6% 71.8% 50.5% 57.3% 37.5% 62.8% 34.1% 2013 11/11 3.7 3.6 56.7% 66.3% 46.9% 46.9% 38.1% 57.6% 32.9%
26 2010 10/10 3.2 1.9 60.1% 66.2% 50.4% 55.2% 46.3% 59.9% 35.6% 2014 8/8 5.9 3.6 61.4% 67.3% 49.6% 53.3% 41.7% 60.5% 34.2%
27 2011 13/13 5.2 3.8 58.6% 68.5% 48.8% 53.9% 44.7% 60.0% 37.3% 2015 19/19 4.1 2.4 60.5% 71.9% 46.6% 55.8% 30.3% 62.1% 35.4%
28 2012 33/37 4.1 1.3 63.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.0% 41.1% 62.7% 37.1% 2016 7/7 4.1 3.3 61.9% 66.4% 54.6% 43.5% 71.3% 62.5% 35.8%
29 2013 8/9 4.0 2.6 62.5% 69.4% 52.7% 51.2% 30.6% 62.7% 33.5% 2017 2/2 1.5 3.5 60.9% 65.2% 51.0% 50.0% 16.7% 59.8% 25.5%
30 2014 1/1 9.0 6.0 61.3% 67.0% 58.5% 68.8% 46.2% 63.7% 37.9% 2018 1/1 4.0 6.0 53.3% 67.2% 51.8% 76.5% 38.5% 60.0% 42.6%
31 2015 18/19 2.6 2.3 62.3% 64.5% 50.0% 64.6% 38.6% 59.5% 35.3% 2019 3/3 4.3 4.3 55.4% 69.1% 44.1% 40.6% 26.3% 57.8% 36.5%
32 2016 8/8 4.5 4.3 54.5% 71.3% 52.0% 52.8% 38.9% 62.4% 36.9% 2020 2/2 7.5 2.5 70.2% 68.1% 43.8% 55.6% 36.4% 60.4% 29.7%
33 2017 33/34 3.3 1.5 61.7% 67.8% 46.8% 54.4% 44.9% 58.8% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 15/15 3.6 1.9 62.3% 66.1% 47.3% 62.1% 36.9% 58.5% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209/218 4.1 2.1 60.6% 68.7% 50.0% 56.7% 40.9% 61.1% 35.9% — 84/85 4.1 3.3 58.5% 67.3% 48.4% 51.6% 38.6% 59.5% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Darcis Tatsuma Ito
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1485 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1460 95.0 -3.59 -0.51 0.669 40.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
21 2005 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1483 102.7 -1.10 +0.91 0.651 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
22 2006 1472 94.9 -4.72 -4.47 0.613 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 2010 1492 106.5 -1.95 +7.36 0.576 42.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
23 2007 1667 133.9 +1.36 +2.37 1.174 53.0% — +39 — 66.7% +1.00 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.67 2011 1513 111.0 -3.38 -2.91 0.676 43.8% +20 — — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 2–0 — 0.00
24 2008 1761 135.5 -1.36 -0.31 0.939 49.3% -35 -44 -175 50.0% -0.07 6–4 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.16 2012 1635 124.2 -2.45 -0.38 0.904 48.0% -2 -103 -65 39.7% -0.91 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.56
25 2009 1545 116.6 -1.07 -1.53 0.918 48.7% +10 +55 +98 24.1% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.42 2013 1618 116.8 -4.05 -1.85 0.775 45.3% +28 — — 28.6% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.28
26 2010 1678 128.9 -1.59 -0.51 0.889 48.2% +4 -43 — 52.6% +0.26 0–1 — — -0.11 2014 1660 123.9 -2.82 -0.02 0.867 47.6% +12 — -29 37.5% -0.25 — 1–3 (25%) — +0.33
27 2011 1795 125.8 -2.07 -0.57 0.934 48.6% -43 -55 — 47.4% -0.03 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.14 2015 1677 125.3 -2.21 -0.52 0.934 48.3% -19 — +54 40.4% -0.68 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.59
28 2012 1786 143.8 -0.59 +0.30 0.994 50.0% -43 -40 -50 54.4% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 16–3 (84%) — -2.70 2016 1671 118.1 -0.69 +0.33 0.956 49.1% +7 — — 44.4% -0.45 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.05
29 2013 1717 114.5 -0.61 -0.45 0.898 48.1% -62 — +57 33.3% -1.05 0–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.52 2017 1626 112.5 -0.78 -3.10 0.634 44.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — -0.06
30 2014 1706 110.7 +1.34 +0.22 1.043 51.1% — — — 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.14 2018 1591 100.3 -1.04 -2.54 1.065 51.8% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.03
31 2015 1739 139.6 -2.44 0.00 0.871 47.8% +50 -47 — 43.2% -0.60 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.13 2019 1586 115.3 -1.04 -1.28 0.863 46.6% +47 — — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 0–1 — +0.29
32 2016 1773 129.3 -0.69 +1.36 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 40.7% -0.33 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32 2020 1584 107.5 +1.82 +0.48 0.751 46.0% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.01
33 2017 1807 136.2 -3.10 +0.27 0.897 47.9% +17 -72 -137 48.1% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.06 2021 1510 90.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1486 89.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1669 114.6 -4.04 -3.13 0.764 45.3% +41 — +47 32.4% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1648 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.3 -1.67 -0.31 0.923 48.7% -5 -28 -35 45.2% -0.33 29–29 (50%) 46–35 (57%) 105.6 -2.32 — 1727 119.8 -2.33 -0.67 0.851 47.0% +6 -103 -18 35.4% -1.04 12–13 (48%) 17–14 (55%) 105.6 +3.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.