H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Steve Darcis vs Thomas Fabbiano

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Steve Darcis vs Thomas Fabbiano.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Darcis
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Thomas Fabbiano
ITA Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Darcis #129 7-6(1) 6-3 Thomas Fabbiano #144 Match data Feb 8, 2016 Q1 Q ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Steve Darcis #125 6-3 6-3 Thomas Fabbiano #253 Match data Feb 3, 2015* Q3 Q Montpellier Open ATP 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,852 94 124 43.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Thomas Fabbiano #1,768 #70 715 1,748 27 63 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Darcis Thomas Fabbiano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #371 1,533 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #313 1,552 0 0
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2008 20–20 50.0% #61 1,761 0 2 2013 0–1 0.0% #180 1,543 0 0
25 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,544 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,678 0 2 2015 0–3 0.0% #157 1,602 0 0
27 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,794 0 2 2016 5–10 33.3% #124 1,613 0 0
28 2012 19–18 51.4% #93 1,785 0 2 2017 4–12 25.0% #73 1,593 0 0
29 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,717 0 2 2018 8–12 40.0% #101 1,670 0 0
30 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,706 0 2 2019 10–18 35.7% #114 1,638 0 0
31 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,738 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #172 1,593 0 0
32 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,773 0 2 2021 0–3 0.0% #204 1,517 0 0
33 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,807 0 2 2022 0–1 0.0% #317 1,526 0 0
35 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Darcis Thomas Fabbiano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 10 9 19 52.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 1 10 11 9.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2011 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2017 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2017 12 10 22 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 66 118 44.1% 24 38 62 38.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — 13 37 50 26.0% 6 20 26 23.1% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 209/218 of Steve Darcis's and 89/90 of Thomas Fabbiano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Steve Darcis Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 3.0 6.0 69.4% 66.2% 52.9% 40.0% 16.7% 62.2% 31.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 52.9% 59.5% 51.5% 40.0% — 55.7% 21.7%
22 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.8% 60.5% 59.5% 75.0% — 60.0% 24.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 8/8 4.4 1.9 56.6% 74.9% 49.9% 48.9% 42.3% 64.3% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 39/40 4.9 1.9 60.0% 69.3% 51.1% 57.2% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0% 2013 1/1 0.0 7.0 66.1% 63.9% 45.9% 75.0% 20.0% 57.8% 25.5%
25 2009 22/23 4.5 2.3 57.6% 71.8% 50.5% 57.3% 37.5% 62.8% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 10/10 3.2 1.9 60.1% 66.2% 50.4% 55.2% 46.3% 59.9% 35.6% 2015 3/3 1.7 3.0 68.2% 62.0% 39.1% 50.0% 42.6% 54.6% 31.2%
27 2011 13/13 5.2 3.8 58.6% 68.5% 48.8% 53.9% 44.7% 60.0% 37.3% 2016 14/15 2.0 2.6 67.4% 62.9% 44.7% 54.2% 44.3% 56.9% 38.3%
28 2012 33/37 4.1 1.3 63.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.0% 41.1% 62.7% 37.1% 2017 16/16 1.8 3.7 63.4% 64.2% 46.4% 46.3% 25.5% 57.8% 36.2%
29 2013 8/9 4.0 2.6 62.5% 69.4% 52.7% 51.2% 30.6% 62.7% 33.5% 2018 20/20 1.9 3.4 63.5% 62.7% 51.0% 62.6% 43.4% 58.0% 38.8%
30 2014 1/1 9.0 6.0 61.3% 67.0% 58.5% 68.8% 46.2% 63.7% 37.9% 2019 28/28 2.3 3.1 65.8% 67.2% 51.4% 55.8% 37.5% 61.8% 34.6%
31 2015 18/19 2.6 2.3 62.3% 64.5% 50.0% 64.6% 38.6% 59.5% 35.3% 2020 1/1 1.0 0.0 59.5% 52.0% 29.4% 37.5% 14.3% 42.9% 38.8%
32 2016 8/8 4.5 4.3 54.5% 71.3% 52.0% 52.8% 38.9% 62.4% 36.9% 2021 3/3 1.7 2.7 69.5% 61.6% 54.2% 64.8% 30.0% 59.3% 37.4%
33 2017 33/34 3.3 1.5 61.7% 67.8% 46.8% 54.4% 44.9% 58.8% 36.9% 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 70.1% 61.7% 40.0% 42.9% 66.7% 55.2% 32.8%
35 2019 15/15 3.6 1.9 62.3% 66.1% 47.3% 62.1% 36.9% 58.5% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209/218 4.1 2.1 60.6% 68.7% 50.0% 56.7% 40.9% 61.1% 35.9% — 89/90 2.0 3.2 65.2% 64.2% 48.6% 55.0% 36.9% 58.7% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Darcis Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1491 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1533 103.8 -4.31 -0.06 0.843 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1510 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1553 109.4 +0.96 +1.43 0.491 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
22 2006 1472 94.9 -4.72 -4.47 0.613 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 2011 1497 93.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1667 133.9 +1.36 +2.37 1.174 53.0% — +39 — 66.7% +1.00 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.67 2012 1521 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1761 135.5 -1.36 -0.31 0.939 49.3% -35 -44 -175 50.0% -0.07 6–4 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.16 2013 1543 110.3 -3.11 +6.63 0.605 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.16
25 2009 1545 116.6 -1.07 -1.53 0.918 48.7% +10 +55 +98 24.1% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.42 2014 1468 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 1678 128.9 -1.59 -0.51 0.889 48.2% +4 -43 — 52.6% +0.26 0–1 — — -0.11 2015 1602 120.4 -2.44 -1.27 0.687 42.9% — +25 — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.11
27 2011 1795 125.8 -2.07 -0.57 0.934 48.6% -43 -55 — 47.4% -0.03 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.14 2016 1614 119.3 -3.97 +0.55 0.888 47.8% +10 -40 — 33.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.75
28 2012 1786 143.8 -0.59 +0.30 0.994 50.0% -43 -40 -50 54.4% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 16–3 (84%) — -2.70 2017 1594 119.6 -4.29 -0.09 0.859 46.6% -7 — +27 28.6% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
29 2013 1717 114.5 -0.61 -0.45 0.898 48.1% -62 — +57 33.3% -1.05 0–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.52 2018 1670 125.6 -3.67 +1.00 0.923 48.5% -120 -92 +67 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.17
30 2014 1706 110.7 +1.34 +0.22 1.043 51.1% — — — 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.14 2019 1638 126.4 -2.10 -0.50 0.905 48.2% -70 -79 +175 41.9% -0.49 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.38
31 2015 1739 139.6 -2.44 0.00 0.871 47.8% +50 -47 — 43.2% -0.60 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.13 2020 1593 101.2 -3.13 -2.21 0.679 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
32 2016 1773 129.3 -0.69 +1.36 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 40.7% -0.33 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32 2021 1517 108.6 -1.11 +1.49 0.920 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.21
33 2017 1807 136.2 -3.10 +0.27 0.897 47.9% +17 -72 -137 48.1% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.06 2022 1526 114.6 +1.39 -0.86 0.732 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
35 2019 1669 114.6 -4.04 -3.13 0.764 45.3% +41 — +47 32.4% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1648 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.3 -1.67 -0.31 0.923 48.7% -5 -28 -35 45.2% -0.33 29–29 (50%) 46–35 (57%) 105.6 -2.32 — 1749 121.9 -3.09 +0.20 0.876 47.5% -45 -61 +120 35.6% -0.90 11–22 (33%) 17–26 (40%) 92.2 +0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.