H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Steve Darcis vs Tomas Zib H2H: 0-1

Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2006 Dutch Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Darcis
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Zib #127 7-5 6-3 Steve Darcis #266 Match data Jul 20, 2006* R32 Dutch Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,852 94 124 43.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Darcis Tomas Zib
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0
23 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0
24 2008 20–20 50.0% #61 1,761 0 2 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0
25 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,544 0 2 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0
26 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,678 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,794 0 2 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0
28 2012 19–18 51.4% #93 1,785 0 2 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0
29 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,717 0 2 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0
30 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,706 0 2 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0
31 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,738 0 2 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0
32 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,773 0 2 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0
33 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,807 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Darcis Tomas Zib
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 10 9 19 52.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 1 10 11 9.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2016 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 12 10 22 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 66 118 44.1% 24 38 62 38.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 209/218 of Steve Darcis's and 123/134 of Tomas Zib's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Steve Darcis Tomas Zib
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.8% 60.5% 59.5% 75.0% — 60.0% 24.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 8/8 4.4 1.9 56.6% 74.9% 49.9% 48.9% 42.3% 64.3% 41.9% 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5%
24 2008 39/40 4.9 1.9 60.0% 69.3% 51.1% 57.2% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0% 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4%
25 2009 22/23 4.5 2.3 57.6% 71.8% 50.5% 57.3% 37.5% 62.8% 34.1% 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8%
26 2010 10/10 3.2 1.9 60.1% 66.2% 50.4% 55.2% 46.3% 59.9% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 13/13 5.2 3.8 58.6% 68.5% 48.8% 53.9% 44.7% 60.0% 37.3% 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5%
28 2012 33/37 4.1 1.3 63.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.0% 41.1% 62.7% 37.1% 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6%
29 2013 8/9 4.0 2.6 62.5% 69.4% 52.7% 51.2% 30.6% 62.7% 33.5% 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9%
30 2014 1/1 9.0 6.0 61.3% 67.0% 58.5% 68.8% 46.2% 63.7% 37.9% 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1%
31 2015 18/19 2.6 2.3 62.3% 64.5% 50.0% 64.6% 38.6% 59.5% 35.3% 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8%
32 2016 8/8 4.5 4.3 54.5% 71.3% 52.0% 52.8% 38.9% 62.4% 36.9% 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3%
33 2017 33/34 3.3 1.5 61.7% 67.8% 46.8% 54.4% 44.9% 58.8% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 15/15 3.6 1.9 62.3% 66.1% 47.3% 62.1% 36.9% 58.5% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209/218 4.1 2.1 60.6% 68.7% 50.0% 56.7% 40.9% 61.1% 35.9% — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Darcis Tomas Zib
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2005 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1472 94.9 -4.72 -4.47 0.613 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05
23 2007 1667 133.9 +1.36 +2.37 1.174 53.0% — +39 — 66.7% +1.00 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.67 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.15
24 2008 1761 135.5 -1.36 -0.31 0.939 49.3% -35 -44 -175 50.0% -0.07 6–4 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.16 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.93
25 2009 1545 116.6 -1.07 -1.53 0.918 48.7% +10 +55 +98 24.1% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.42 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84
26 2010 1678 128.9 -1.59 -0.51 0.889 48.2% +4 -43 — 52.6% +0.26 0–1 — — -0.11 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1795 125.8 -2.07 -0.57 0.934 48.6% -43 -55 — 47.4% -0.03 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.14 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14
28 2012 1786 143.8 -0.59 +0.30 0.994 50.0% -43 -40 -50 54.4% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 16–3 (84%) — -2.70 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.23
29 2013 1717 114.5 -0.61 -0.45 0.898 48.1% -62 — +57 33.3% -1.05 0–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.52 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.40
30 2014 1706 110.7 +1.34 +0.22 1.043 51.1% — — — 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.14 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.86
31 2015 1739 139.6 -2.44 0.00 0.871 47.8% +50 -47 — 43.2% -0.60 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.13 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
32 2016 1773 129.3 -0.69 +1.36 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 40.7% -0.33 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06
33 2017 1807 136.2 -3.10 +0.27 0.897 47.9% +17 -72 -137 48.1% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.06 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1669 114.6 -4.04 -3.13 0.764 45.3% +41 — +47 32.4% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1648 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.3 -1.67 -0.31 0.923 48.7% -5 -28 -35 45.2% -0.33 29–29 (50%) 46–35 (57%) 105.6 -2.32 — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.