H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Steve Darcis vs Tomas Zib H2H: 0-1
Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2006 Amersfoort third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2006* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Zib | 7-5 6-3 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steve Darcis | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |