H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Steve Denton vs Francisco Gonzalez H2H: 2-0
Steve Denton holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Steve Denton leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Denton won the 1982 Cincinnati third round 3-6 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1982* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Steve Denton | 3-6 6-3 7-6 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1982* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Steve Denton | 6-7 6-2 7-6 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Denton | #1,054 | #12 | 0 | 1,980 | 109 | 116 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steve Denton | Francisco Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #54 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,929 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #58 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #149 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #241 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #300 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #560 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |