H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Steve Johnson vs Andrey Kuznetsov H2H: 0-1
Andrey Kuznetsov holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Johnson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrey Kuznetsov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrey Kuznetsov won the 2016 Geneva fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2016* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrey Kuznetsov | 7-5 6-4 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Andrey Kuznetsov | #1,435 | #39 | 1,093 | 1,952 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steve Johnson | Andrey Kuznetsov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #301 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,899 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #107 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1369 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |