H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Steve Johnson vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-1
Steve Johnson and Sergiy Stakhovsky are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Steve Johnson leads 1–0 on clay, while Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2015 Nottingham second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2015* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-4 6-3 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| May 28, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Steve Johnson | 2-6 6-3 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Steve Johnson | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |