H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Steve Johnson vs Steve Darcis H2H: 0-1

Steve Darcis holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Johnson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2012 San Jose round of 32 7-6(4) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Johnson
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Steve Darcis
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Darcis #72 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Steve Johnson #365 Match data Feb 16, 2012* R32 San Jose ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Johnson #1,015 #21 1,680 1,990 199 202 49.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,852 94 124 43.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Johnson Steve Darcis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 0–2 0.0% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 3–5 37.5% #175 1,573 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0
23 2013 4–10 28.6% #156 1,667 0 0 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1
24 2014 20–20 50.0% #37 1,748 0 0 2008 20–20 50.0% #61 1,761 0 2
25 2015 37–27 57.8% #32 1,950 0 0 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,544 0 2
26 2016 30–28 51.7% #33 1,891 0 1 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,678 0 2
27 2017 29–23 55.8% #44 1,866 0 2 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,794 0 2
28 2018 27–22 55.1% #33 1,834 0 4 2012 19–18 51.4% #93 1,785 0 2
29 2019 14–21 40.0% #85 1,736 0 4 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,717 0 2
30 2020 6–8 42.9% #72 1,722 0 4 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,706 0 2
31 2021 10–12 45.5% #85 1,704 0 4 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,738 0 2
32 2022 17–17 50.0% #110 1,690 0 4 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,773 0 2
33 2023 2–5 28.6% #241 1,571 0 4 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,807 0 2
34 2024 0–1 0.0% #1017 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,668 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Johnson Steve Darcis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 13 13 26 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2008 10 9 19 52.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2015 29 17 46 63.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2009 1 10 11 9.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2016 18 19 37 48.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2017 17 17 34 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2011 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2018 11 16 27 40.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
29 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2020 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2022 11 13 24 45.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2016 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 12 10 22 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
34 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 127 140 267 47.6% 34 32 66 51.5% 38 30 68 55.9% — — — — — 52 66 118 44.1% 24 38 62 38.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 393/401 of Steve Johnson's and 209/218 of Steve Darcis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Steve Johnson Steve Darcis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2010 1/1 2.0 5.0 48.6% 70.6% 44.4% 75.0% 20.0% 57.1% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2/2 15.5 6.5 60.7% 76.6% 47.7% 71.4% 32.5% 65.2% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 8/8 9.6 4.4 59.6% 74.3% 50.4% 71.8% 27.9% 64.9% 28.2% 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.8% 60.5% 59.5% 75.0% — 60.0% 24.5%
23 2013 14/14 9.3 4.2 56.6% 71.6% 51.5% 73.4% 39.8% 62.8% 29.5% 2007 8/8 4.4 1.9 56.6% 74.9% 49.9% 48.9% 42.3% 64.3% 41.9%
24 2014 39/40 8.2 2.5 59.8% 76.6% 51.1% 61.9% 34.7% 66.5% 32.7% 2008 39/40 4.9 1.9 60.0% 69.3% 51.1% 57.2% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0%
25 2015 63/64 9.8 2.8 60.0% 75.8% 54.3% 60.7% 37.6% 67.2% 34.0% 2009 22/23 4.5 2.3 57.6% 71.8% 50.5% 57.3% 37.5% 62.8% 34.1%
26 2016 54/58 8.6 2.6 60.7% 75.7% 52.7% 60.4% 35.2% 66.8% 33.3% 2010 10/10 3.2 1.9 60.1% 66.2% 50.4% 55.2% 46.3% 59.9% 35.6%
27 2017 51/52 8.1 3.5 59.9% 76.8% 51.9% 60.9% 43.9% 66.6% 33.7% 2011 13/13 5.2 3.8 58.6% 68.5% 48.8% 53.9% 44.7% 60.0% 37.3%
28 2018 49/49 7.1 3.2 57.7% 75.3% 54.8% 72.4% 40.2% 66.6% 35.1% 2012 33/37 4.1 1.3 63.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.0% 41.1% 62.7% 37.1%
29 2019 35/35 6.2 2.8 58.7% 73.9% 52.4% 55.0% 44.3% 65.1% 33.8% 2013 8/9 4.0 2.6 62.5% 69.4% 52.7% 51.2% 30.6% 62.7% 33.5%
30 2020 14/14 8.1 2.9 60.3% 70.3% 48.7% 64.6% 42.7% 61.7% 30.8% 2014 1/1 9.0 6.0 61.3% 67.0% 58.5% 68.8% 46.2% 63.7% 37.9%
31 2021 22/22 9.8 3.8 54.8% 74.8% 54.0% 62.6% 39.7% 65.3% 32.9% 2015 18/19 2.6 2.3 62.3% 64.5% 50.0% 64.6% 38.6% 59.5% 35.3%
32 2022 33/34 9.7 3.8 56.5% 77.3% 52.4% 64.8% 33.5% 66.5% 31.0% 2016 8/8 4.5 4.3 54.5% 71.3% 52.0% 52.8% 38.9% 62.4% 36.9%
33 2023 7/7 7.1 3.3 60.9% 72.7% 45.4% 51.2% 36.3% 61.8% 28.6% 2017 33/34 3.3 1.5 61.7% 67.8% 46.8% 54.4% 44.9% 58.8% 36.9%
34 2024 1/1 4.0 2.0 52.4% 60.6% 46.7% 75.0% 0.0% 54.0% 25.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 15/15 3.6 1.9 62.3% 66.1% 47.3% 62.1% 36.9% 58.5% 31.7%
Career — 393/401 8.5 3.1 58.9% 75.4% 52.5% 63.0% 38.3% 66.0% 33.0% — 209/218 4.1 2.1 60.6% 68.7% 50.0% 56.7% 40.9% 61.1% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Johnson Steve Darcis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2009 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1530 109.8 +0.50 -2.82 0.789 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1522 113.4 -1.94 +0.90 0.951 49.0% — — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.11 2005 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1574 119.2 -0.17 -4.17 0.803 47.5% +16 — — 38.1% -0.29 1–0 2–7 (22%) — +0.64 2006 1472 94.9 -4.72 -4.47 0.613 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17
23 2013 1668 132.4 -0.53 -4.17 0.793 47.2% +9 — — 38.1% -0.62 2–4 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 96.8 -0.27 2007 1667 133.9 +1.36 +2.37 1.174 53.0% — +39 — 66.7% +1.00 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.67
24 2014 1748 148.4 +1.33 -1.62 0.977 49.8% +26 -145 -104 47.3% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–13 (46%) 103.2 +0.22 2008 1761 135.5 -1.36 -0.31 0.939 49.3% -35 -44 -175 50.0% -0.07 6–4 (60%) 12–5 (71%) 108.6 -0.16
25 2015 1950 159.6 +2.13 -0.70 1.037 50.6% +26 -258 -270 51.9% +0.16 16–8 (67%) 14–19 (42%) 104.8 -1.02 2009 1545 116.6 -1.07 -1.53 0.918 48.7% +10 +55 +98 24.1% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 2–8 (20%) 92.1 +0.42
26 2016 1891 154.9 +2.76 -1.97 1.000 50.0% -21 -257 +27 52.1% +0.11 5–7 (42%) 20–15 (57%) 101.9 +0.52 2010 1678 128.9 -1.59 -0.51 0.889 48.2% +4 -43 — 52.6% +0.26 0–1 — — -0.11
27 2017 1867 153.8 +2.38 -1.66 1.009 50.3% -25 -60 -12 53.8% +0.15 9–8 (53%) 13–14 (48%) 99.8 -0.43 2011 1795 125.8 -2.07 -0.57 0.934 48.6% -43 -55 — 47.4% -0.03 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.14
28 2018 1834 151.4 +2.39 -0.48 1.050 51.1% -64 +70 +48 55.3% +0.40 6–8 (43%) 14–10 (58%) 98.9 -0.37 2012 1786 143.8 -0.59 +0.30 0.994 50.0% -43 -40 -50 54.4% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 16–3 (84%) 108.9 -2.70
29 2019 1736 133.2 +0.53 -1.35 0.971 49.8% -34 +63 +93 43.8% -0.15 3–8 (27%) 7–13 (35%) 91.3 +0.58 2013 1717 114.5 -0.61 -0.45 0.898 48.1% -62 — +57 33.3% -1.05 0–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.52
30 2020 1723 135.7 -1.27 -2.85 0.805 47.0% +5 — — 38.5% -0.69 4–1 (80%) 5–9 (36%) 101.1 -0.66 2014 1706 110.7 +1.34 +0.22 1.043 51.1% — — — 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
31 2021 1705 134.5 +0.86 -2.04 0.950 49.4% +1 +76 +95 47.6% -0.08 3–4 (43%) 11–6 (65%) 102.7 +1.05 2015 1739 139.6 -2.44 0.00 0.871 47.8% +50 -47 — 43.2% -0.60 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.5 -1.13
32 2022 1690 133.0 +1.22 -3.58 0.925 49.2% -10 +72 +109 46.4% -0.32 5–6 (45%) 11–12 (48%) 99.8 +0.87 2016 1773 129.3 -0.69 +1.36 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 40.7% -0.33 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 100.8 +0.32
33 2023 1571 106.5 -1.26 -2.63 0.748 46.0% 0 — — 29.4% -1.23 1–1 1–1 — -0.02 2017 1807 136.2 -3.10 +0.27 0.897 47.9% +17 -72 -137 48.1% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 2–7 (22%) 98.4 -1.06
34 2024 1565 107.5 -6.04 +0.81 0.563 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1669 114.6 -4.04 -3.13 0.764 45.3% +41 — +47 32.4% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.76
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1648 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1990 151.4 +1.54 -1.74 0.972 49.8% -8 -61 -5 48.7% -0.05 62–62 (50%) 114–127 (47%) 99.8 +0.22 — 1852 137.3 -1.67 -0.31 0.923 48.7% -5 -28 -35 45.2% -0.33 29–29 (50%) 46–35 (57%) 105.6 -2.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.