H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Steve Johnson vs Steve Darcis H2H: 0-1
Steve Darcis holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Johnson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2012 San Jose third round 7-6(4) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2012* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Steve Johnson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steve Johnson | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |