H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Steve Johnson vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 1-2

Tatsuma Ito holds a 2–1 lead over Steve Johnson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Tatsuma Ito leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatsuma Ito won the 2015 Newport round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Johnson
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Tatsuma Ito
JPN Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatsuma Ito #116 6-4 6-4 Steve Johnson #49 Match data Jul 17, 2015* R16 Newport ATP 250 Grass
Tatsuma Ito #126 6-2 3-6 5-7 4-1 (ret.) Steve Johnson #51 Match data Aug 27, 2014* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Steve Johnson #69 6-3 2-0 (ret.) Tatsuma Ito #129 Match data Jul 11, 2014* R16 Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Johnson #1,015 #21 1,680 1,990 199 202 49.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tatsuma Ito #1,822 #60 725 1,726 28 57 32.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Johnson Tatsuma Ito
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,529 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #313 1,460 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% — 1,521 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #210 1,483 0 0
22 2012 3–5 37.5% #175 1,573 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #183 1,491 0 0
23 2013 4–10 28.6% #156 1,667 0 0 2011 2–4 33.3% #122 1,513 0 0
24 2014 20–20 50.0% #37 1,748 0 0 2012 9–13 40.9% #79 1,634 0 0
25 2015 37–27 57.8% #32 1,950 0 0 2013 2–9 18.2% #155 1,617 0 0
26 2016 30–28 51.7% #33 1,891 0 1 2014 3–5 37.5% #93 1,660 0 0
27 2017 29–23 55.8% #44 1,866 0 2 2015 8–11 42.1% #119 1,677 0 0
28 2018 27–22 55.1% #33 1,834 0 4 2016 3–4 42.9% #171 1,671 0 0
29 2019 14–21 40.0% #85 1,736 0 4 2017 0–2 0.0% #153 1,625 0 0
30 2020 6–8 42.9% #72 1,722 0 4 2018 0–1 0.0% #148 1,590 0 0
31 2021 10–12 45.5% #85 1,704 0 4 2019 0–3 0.0% #147 1,586 0 0
32 2022 17–17 50.0% #110 1,690 0 4 2020 1–1 50.0% #186 1,583 0 0
33 2023 2–5 28.6% #241 1,571 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2024 0–1 0.0% #1017 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Johnson Tatsuma Ito
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2012 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 13 13 26 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2015 29 17 46 63.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 18 19 37 48.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2017 17 17 34 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2015 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2018 11 16 27 40.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2016 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2020 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2021 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 11 13 24 45.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 140 267 47.6% 34 32 66 51.5% 38 30 68 55.9% — 19 41 60 31.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 12 20 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 393/401 of Steve Johnson's and 84/85 of Tatsuma Ito's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Steve Johnson Tatsuma Ito
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2010 1/1 2.0 5.0 48.6% 70.6% 44.4% 75.0% 20.0% 57.1% 33.8% 2008 1/1 2.0 4.0 61.5% 43.8% 45.0% 28.6% 20.0% 44.2% 37.3%
21 2011 2/2 15.5 6.5 60.7% 76.6% 47.7% 71.4% 32.5% 65.2% 33.1% 2009 2/2 3.5 3.0 55.7% 63.5% 30.4% 29.8% 75.0% 48.9% 33.3%
22 2012 8/8 9.6 4.4 59.6% 74.3% 50.4% 71.8% 27.9% 64.9% 28.2% 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 49.2% 63.3% 48.4% 57.1% 33.3% 55.7% 25.5%
23 2013 14/14 9.3 4.2 56.6% 71.6% 51.5% 73.4% 39.8% 62.8% 29.5% 2011 6/6 3.5 3.7 55.2% 63.9% 48.4% 54.0% 24.4% 57.2% 28.9%
24 2014 39/40 8.2 2.5 59.8% 76.6% 51.1% 61.9% 34.7% 66.5% 32.7% 2012 21/22 4.0 3.5 56.3% 66.6% 50.9% 54.8% 40.0% 59.6% 36.5%
25 2015 63/64 9.8 2.8 60.0% 75.8% 54.3% 60.7% 37.6% 67.2% 34.0% 2013 11/11 3.7 3.6 56.7% 66.3% 46.9% 46.9% 38.1% 57.6% 32.9%
26 2016 54/58 8.6 2.6 60.7% 75.7% 52.7% 60.4% 35.2% 66.8% 33.3% 2014 8/8 5.9 3.6 61.4% 67.3% 49.6% 53.3% 41.7% 60.5% 34.2%
27 2017 51/52 8.1 3.5 59.9% 76.8% 51.9% 60.9% 43.9% 66.6% 33.7% 2015 19/19 4.1 2.4 60.5% 71.9% 46.6% 55.8% 30.3% 62.1% 35.4%
28 2018 49/49 7.1 3.2 57.7% 75.3% 54.8% 72.4% 40.2% 66.6% 35.1% 2016 7/7 4.1 3.3 61.9% 66.4% 54.6% 43.5% 71.3% 62.5% 35.8%
29 2019 35/35 6.2 2.8 58.7% 73.9% 52.4% 55.0% 44.3% 65.1% 33.8% 2017 2/2 1.5 3.5 60.9% 65.2% 51.0% 50.0% 16.7% 59.8% 25.5%
30 2020 14/14 8.1 2.9 60.3% 70.3% 48.7% 64.6% 42.7% 61.7% 30.8% 2018 1/1 4.0 6.0 53.3% 67.2% 51.8% 76.5% 38.5% 60.0% 42.6%
31 2021 22/22 9.8 3.8 54.8% 74.8% 54.0% 62.6% 39.7% 65.3% 32.9% 2019 3/3 4.3 4.3 55.4% 69.1% 44.1% 40.6% 26.3% 57.8% 36.5%
32 2022 33/34 9.7 3.8 56.5% 77.3% 52.4% 64.8% 33.5% 66.5% 31.0% 2020 2/2 7.5 2.5 70.2% 68.1% 43.8% 55.6% 36.4% 60.4% 29.7%
33 2023 7/7 7.1 3.3 60.9% 72.7% 45.4% 51.2% 36.3% 61.8% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1/1 4.0 2.0 52.4% 60.6% 46.7% 75.0% 0.0% 54.0% 25.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 393/401 8.5 3.1 58.9% 75.4% 52.5% 63.0% 38.3% 66.0% 33.0% — 84/85 4.1 3.3 58.5% 67.3% 48.4% 51.6% 38.6% 59.5% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Johnson Tatsuma Ito
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2009 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1485 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1530 109.8 +0.50 -2.82 0.789 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 2008 1460 95.0 -3.59 -0.51 0.669 40.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
21 2011 1522 113.4 -1.94 +0.90 0.951 49.0% — — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.11 2009 1483 102.7 -1.10 +0.91 0.651 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
22 2012 1574 119.2 -0.17 -4.17 0.803 47.5% +16 — — 38.1% -0.29 1–0 2–7 (22%) — +0.64 2010 1492 106.5 -1.95 +7.36 0.576 42.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
23 2013 1668 132.4 -0.53 -4.17 0.793 47.2% +9 — — 38.1% -0.62 2–4 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.27 2011 1513 111.0 -3.38 -2.91 0.676 43.8% +20 — — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 2–0 — 0.00
24 2014 1748 148.4 +1.33 -1.62 0.977 49.8% +26 -145 -104 47.3% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.22 2012 1635 124.2 -2.45 -0.38 0.904 48.0% -2 -103 -65 39.7% -0.91 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.56
25 2015 1950 159.6 +2.13 -0.70 1.037 50.6% +26 -258 -270 51.9% +0.16 16–8 (67%) 14–19 (42%) — -1.02 2013 1618 116.8 -4.05 -1.85 0.775 45.3% +28 — — 28.6% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.28
26 2016 1891 154.9 +2.76 -1.97 1.000 50.0% -21 -257 +27 52.1% +0.11 5–7 (42%) 20–15 (57%) — +0.52 2014 1660 123.9 -2.82 -0.02 0.867 47.6% +12 — -29 37.5% -0.25 — 1–3 (25%) — +0.33
27 2017 1867 153.8 +2.38 -1.66 1.009 50.3% -25 -60 -12 53.8% +0.15 9–8 (53%) 13–14 (48%) — -0.43 2015 1677 125.3 -2.21 -0.52 0.934 48.3% -19 — +54 40.4% -0.68 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.59
28 2018 1834 151.4 +2.39 -0.48 1.050 51.1% -64 +70 +48 55.3% +0.40 6–8 (43%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.37 2016 1671 118.1 -0.69 +0.33 0.956 49.1% +7 — — 44.4% -0.45 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.05
29 2019 1736 133.2 +0.53 -1.35 0.971 49.8% -34 +63 +93 43.8% -0.15 3–8 (27%) 7–13 (35%) — +0.58 2017 1626 112.5 -0.78 -3.10 0.634 44.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — -0.06
30 2020 1723 135.7 -1.27 -2.85 0.805 47.0% +5 — — 38.5% -0.69 4–1 (80%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.66 2018 1591 100.3 -1.04 -2.54 1.065 51.8% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.03
31 2021 1705 134.5 +0.86 -2.04 0.950 49.4% +1 +76 +95 47.6% -0.08 3–4 (43%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.05 2019 1586 115.3 -1.04 -1.28 0.863 46.6% +47 — — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 0–1 — +0.29
32 2022 1690 133.0 +1.22 -3.58 0.925 49.2% -10 +72 +109 46.4% -0.32 5–6 (45%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.87 2020 1584 107.5 +1.82 +0.48 0.751 46.0% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.01
33 2023 1571 106.5 -1.26 -2.63 0.748 46.0% 0 — — 29.4% -1.23 1–1 1–1 — -0.02 2021 1510 90.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1565 107.5 -6.04 +0.81 0.563 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10 2022 1486 89.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1990 151.4 +1.54 -1.74 0.972 49.8% -8 -61 -5 48.7% -0.05 62–62 (50%) 114–127 (47%) 99.8 +0.22 — 1727 119.8 -2.33 -0.67 0.851 47.0% +6 -103 -18 35.4% -1.04 12–13 (48%) 17–14 (55%) 105.6 +3.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.