H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Steve Johnson vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0

Steve Johnson holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Johnson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2017 Eastbourne Open second round 6-3 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Johnson
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Fabbiano
ITA Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Johnson #31 6-3 5-7 6-4 Thomas Fabbiano #95 Match data Jun 29, 2017* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Johnson #1,015 #21 1,680 1,990 199 202 49.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Thomas Fabbiano #1,768 #70 715 1,748 27 63 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Johnson Thomas Fabbiano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #371 1,533 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 0–2 0.0% — 1,521 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #313 1,552 0 0
22 2012 3–5 37.5% #175 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2013 4–10 28.6% #156 1,667 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2014 20–20 50.0% #37 1,748 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #180 1,543 0 0
25 2015 37–27 57.8% #32 1,950 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2016 30–28 51.7% #33 1,891 0 1 2015 0–3 0.0% #157 1,602 0 0
27 2017 29–23 55.8% #44 1,866 0 2 2016 5–10 33.3% #124 1,613 0 0
28 2018 27–22 55.1% #33 1,834 0 4 2017 4–12 25.0% #73 1,593 0 0
29 2019 14–21 40.0% #85 1,736 0 4 2018 8–12 40.0% #101 1,670 0 0
30 2020 6–8 42.9% #72 1,722 0 4 2019 10–18 35.7% #114 1,638 0 0
31 2021 10–12 45.5% #85 1,704 0 4 2020 0–1 0.0% #172 1,593 0 0
32 2022 17–17 50.0% #110 1,690 0 4 2021 0–3 0.0% #204 1,517 0 0
33 2023 2–5 28.6% #241 1,571 0 4 2022 0–1 0.0% #317 1,526 0 0
34 2024 0–1 0.0% #1017 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Johnson Thomas Fabbiano
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 13 13 26 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2015 29 17 46 63.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 18 19 37 48.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2017 17 17 34 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2018 11 16 27 40.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2017 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2020 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2021 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 11 13 24 45.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 140 267 47.6% 34 32 66 51.5% 38 30 68 55.9% — 13 37 50 26.0% 6 20 26 23.1% 8 6 14 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 393/401 of Steve Johnson's and 89/90 of Thomas Fabbiano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Steve Johnson Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 3.0 6.0 69.4% 66.2% 52.9% 40.0% 16.7% 62.2% 31.9%
20 2010 1/1 2.0 5.0 48.6% 70.6% 44.4% 75.0% 20.0% 57.1% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2/2 15.5 6.5 60.7% 76.6% 47.7% 71.4% 32.5% 65.2% 33.1% 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 52.9% 59.5% 51.5% 40.0% — 55.7% 21.7%
22 2012 8/8 9.6 4.4 59.6% 74.3% 50.4% 71.8% 27.9% 64.9% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 14/14 9.3 4.2 56.6% 71.6% 51.5% 73.4% 39.8% 62.8% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 39/40 8.2 2.5 59.8% 76.6% 51.1% 61.9% 34.7% 66.5% 32.7% 2013 1/1 0.0 7.0 66.1% 63.9% 45.9% 75.0% 20.0% 57.8% 25.5%
25 2015 63/64 9.8 2.8 60.0% 75.8% 54.3% 60.7% 37.6% 67.2% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 54/58 8.6 2.6 60.7% 75.7% 52.7% 60.4% 35.2% 66.8% 33.3% 2015 3/3 1.7 3.0 68.2% 62.0% 39.1% 50.0% 42.6% 54.6% 31.2%
27 2017 51/52 8.1 3.5 59.9% 76.8% 51.9% 60.9% 43.9% 66.6% 33.7% 2016 14/15 2.0 2.6 67.4% 62.9% 44.7% 54.2% 44.3% 56.9% 38.3%
28 2018 49/49 7.1 3.2 57.7% 75.3% 54.8% 72.4% 40.2% 66.6% 35.1% 2017 16/16 1.8 3.7 63.4% 64.2% 46.4% 46.3% 25.5% 57.8% 36.2%
29 2019 35/35 6.2 2.8 58.7% 73.9% 52.4% 55.0% 44.3% 65.1% 33.8% 2018 20/20 1.9 3.4 63.5% 62.7% 51.0% 62.6% 43.4% 58.0% 38.8%
30 2020 14/14 8.1 2.9 60.3% 70.3% 48.7% 64.6% 42.7% 61.7% 30.8% 2019 28/28 2.3 3.1 65.8% 67.2% 51.4% 55.8% 37.5% 61.8% 34.6%
31 2021 22/22 9.8 3.8 54.8% 74.8% 54.0% 62.6% 39.7% 65.3% 32.9% 2020 1/1 1.0 0.0 59.5% 52.0% 29.4% 37.5% 14.3% 42.9% 38.8%
32 2022 33/34 9.7 3.8 56.5% 77.3% 52.4% 64.8% 33.5% 66.5% 31.0% 2021 3/3 1.7 2.7 69.5% 61.6% 54.2% 64.8% 30.0% 59.3% 37.4%
33 2023 7/7 7.1 3.3 60.9% 72.7% 45.4% 51.2% 36.3% 61.8% 28.6% 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 70.1% 61.7% 40.0% 42.9% 66.7% 55.2% 32.8%
34 2024 1/1 4.0 2.0 52.4% 60.6% 46.7% 75.0% 0.0% 54.0% 25.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 393/401 8.5 3.1 58.9% 75.4% 52.5% 63.0% 38.3% 66.0% 33.0% — 89/90 2.0 3.2 65.2% 64.2% 48.6% 55.0% 36.9% 58.7% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Johnson Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1491 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1533 103.8 -4.31 -0.06 0.843 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
20 2010 1530 109.8 +0.50 -2.82 0.789 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 2009 1510 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1522 113.4 -1.94 +0.90 0.951 49.0% — — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.11 2010 1553 109.4 +0.96 +1.43 0.491 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
22 2012 1574 119.2 -0.17 -4.17 0.803 47.5% +16 — — 38.1% -0.29 1–0 2–7 (22%) — +0.64 2011 1497 93.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 1668 132.4 -0.53 -4.17 0.793 47.2% +9 — — 38.1% -0.62 2–4 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.27 2012 1521 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 1748 148.4 +1.33 -1.62 0.977 49.8% +26 -145 -104 47.3% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.22 2013 1543 110.3 -3.11 +6.63 0.605 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.16
25 2015 1950 159.6 +2.13 -0.70 1.037 50.6% +26 -258 -270 51.9% +0.16 16–8 (67%) 14–19 (42%) — -1.02 2014 1468 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 1891 154.9 +2.76 -1.97 1.000 50.0% -21 -257 +27 52.1% +0.11 5–7 (42%) 20–15 (57%) — +0.52 2015 1602 120.4 -2.44 -1.27 0.687 42.9% — +25 — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.11
27 2017 1867 153.8 +2.38 -1.66 1.009 50.3% -25 -60 -12 53.8% +0.15 9–8 (53%) 13–14 (48%) — -0.43 2016 1614 119.3 -3.97 +0.55 0.888 47.8% +10 -40 — 33.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.75
28 2018 1834 151.4 +2.39 -0.48 1.050 51.1% -64 +70 +48 55.3% +0.40 6–8 (43%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.37 2017 1594 119.6 -4.29 -0.09 0.859 46.6% -7 — +27 28.6% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
29 2019 1736 133.2 +0.53 -1.35 0.971 49.8% -34 +63 +93 43.8% -0.15 3–8 (27%) 7–13 (35%) — +0.58 2018 1670 125.6 -3.67 +1.00 0.923 48.5% -120 -92 +67 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.17
30 2020 1723 135.7 -1.27 -2.85 0.805 47.0% +5 — — 38.5% -0.69 4–1 (80%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.66 2019 1638 126.4 -2.10 -0.50 0.905 48.2% -70 -79 +175 41.9% -0.49 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.38
31 2021 1705 134.5 +0.86 -2.04 0.950 49.4% +1 +76 +95 47.6% -0.08 3–4 (43%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.05 2020 1593 101.2 -3.13 -2.21 0.679 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
32 2022 1690 133.0 +1.22 -3.58 0.925 49.2% -10 +72 +109 46.4% -0.32 5–6 (45%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.87 2021 1517 108.6 -1.11 +1.49 0.920 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.21
33 2023 1571 106.5 -1.26 -2.63 0.748 46.0% 0 — — 29.4% -1.23 1–1 1–1 — -0.02 2022 1526 114.6 +1.39 -0.86 0.732 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
34 2024 1565 107.5 -6.04 +0.81 0.563 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1990 151.4 +1.54 -1.74 0.972 49.8% -8 -61 -5 48.7% -0.05 62–62 (50%) 114–127 (47%) 99.8 +0.22 — 1749 121.9 -3.09 +0.20 0.876 47.5% -45 -61 +120 35.6% -0.90 11–22 (33%) 17–26 (40%) 92.2 +0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.