H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Steve Johnson vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 1-0
Steve Johnson holds a 1–0 lead over Vasek Pospisil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Johnson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2016 Nottingham fourth round 7-6(4) 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2016* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Steve Johnson | 7-6(4) 7-6(1) | Vasek Pospisil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steve Johnson | Vasek Pospisil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |