H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Steve Krulevitz vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 0-1

Ken Rosewall holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Krulevitz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1976 Hong Kong Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Krulevitz
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Ken Rosewall
AUS Age 91 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ken Rosewall 6-3 6-3 Steve Krulevitz Match data Nov 12, 1976* QF Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Krulevitz #602 #70 0 1,766 122 201 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ken Rosewall #255 #2 0 2,233 535 193 73.5% 4 0 0 1 34 39

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Krulevitz Ken Rosewall
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1970 1–5 16.7% — 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1971 2–7 22.2% — 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1972 0–3 0.0% — 1,452 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1973 1–4 20.0% #234 1,438 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1974 16–23 41.0% #91 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1975 13–27 32.5% #131 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1976 23–23 50.0% #77 1,751 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1977 14–21 40.0% #99 1,689 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1978 6–15 28.6% #205 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1979 6–13 31.6% #152 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1980 19–23 45.2% #134 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1981 14–13 51.9% #82 1,655 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1982 7–21 25.0% #99 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1983 0–2 0.0% #210 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1968 45–12 78.9% — 1,854 1 4
34 — — — — — — — 1969 49–21 70.0% — 1,943 1 7
35 — — — — — — — 1970 72–21 77.4% — 2,086 2 13
36 — — — — — — — 1971 80–24 76.9% — 2,158 3 21
37 — — — — — — — 1972 61–15 80.3% — 2,117 4 28
38 — — — — — — — 1973 65–17 79.3% #6 2,106 4 33
39 — — — — — — — 1974 26–7 78.8% #9 2,114 4 33
40 — — — — — — — 1975 37–11 77.1% #6 1,998 4 36
41 — — — — — — — 1976 35–18 66.0% #13 1,978 4 38
42 — — — — — — — 1977 39–20 66.1% #11 1,981 4 39
43 — — — — — — — 1978 19–19 50.0% #34 1,809 4 39
44 — — — — — — — 1979 4–5 44.4% #207 1,747 4 39
45 — — — — — — — 1980 3–3 50.0% #255 1,747 4 39

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Krulevitz Ken Rosewall
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1969 1483 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1460 106.5 — — — — — +48 — 26.7% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 1477 108.2 — — — — +44 +41 — 25.0% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 1453 104.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 1439 107.1 — — — — — — +62 30.8% -1.08 0–1 1–0 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 1539 121.2 — — — — -52 -3 +6 44.8% -0.37 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1975 1567 131.8 — — — — -45 -21 — 35.5% -0.75 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1976 1751 135.7 — — — — -83 -96 -194 49.1% -0.06 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1977 1690 135.8 — — — — -58 -3 — 40.2% -0.52 4–4 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1978 1581 119.8 — — — — +15 +38 -43 30.0% -1.32 3–3 (50%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 1582 119.9 — — — — +6 +10 -38 41.2% -0.59 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 1614 129.7 — — — — +37 -48 — 46.0% -0.26 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — +2.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1655 121.0 — — — — +18 -18 — 49.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1498 113.2 — — — — +18 +84 +43 33.8% -1.20 4–8 (33%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1473 95.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1855 127.3 — — — — -37 -15 -122 72.6% +1.53 6–4 (60%) — — +0.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1944 143.7 — — — — +58 -13 -84 64.8% +1.25 11–10 (52%) — — -2.55
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 2087 161.2 — — — — -35 -47 +195 72.2% +1.57 10–6 (63%) 5–3 (63%) — -3.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 2159 161.8 — — — — +91 -83 +112 73.0% +1.68 13–5 (72%) 11–9 (55%) — -5.10
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2118 162.7 — — — — +62 +74 +120 74.4% +1.64 14–8 (64%) 14–8 (64%) — -2.93
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2106 159.5 — — — — +10 +119 +57 74.3% +1.84 13–12 (52%) 11–9 (55%) — -2.08
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2114 153.5 — — — — -17 — +148 68.8% +1.19 5–2 (71%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.13
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1998 149.9 — — — — +18 +205 +172 72.2% +1.56 9–3 (75%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.64
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1978 156.6 — — — — +69 +134 +115 63.2% +0.93 6–5 (55%) 9–0 (100%) — -0.11
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1982 157.9 — — — — +99 +50 +68 62.2% +0.78 11–10 (52%) 11–6 (65%) — -1.33
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1809 142.6 — — — — +145 +61 +178 51.1% +0.18 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.68
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1748 115.3 — — — — +136 — +221 52.4% -0.05 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.41
45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1748 117.3 — — — — +115 — — 53.3% -0.33 1–2 (33%) — — -0.23
Career — 1767 130.9 — — — — -17 -12 -19 40.8% -0.64 40–57 (41%) 39–41 (49%) 96.9 +0.99 — 2234 159.3 — — — — +43 +53 +84 69.0% +1.35 103–75 (58%) 74–52 (59%) 97.4 -2.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.