H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Steve Krulevitz vs Patricio Cornejo H2H: 0-2

Patricio Cornejo holds a 2–0 lead over Steve Krulevitz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricio Cornejo leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricio Cornejo won the 1974 Stockholm Open round of 64 6-4 6-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Krulevitz
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Patricio Cornejo
CHI Age 82 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricio Cornejo 6-4 6-7 6-4 Steve Krulevitz Match data Nov 6, 1974* R64 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Patricio Cornejo 6-4 6-2 Steve Krulevitz Match data Jul 25, 1974* R64 Washington Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Krulevitz #602 #70 0 1,766 122 200 37.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patricio Cornejo #335 #65 0 1,708 140 201 41.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Krulevitz Patricio Cornejo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1970 1–4 20.0% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1971 2–7 22.2% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1972 0–3 0.0% — 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1973 1–4 20.0% #234 1,440 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1974 16–23 41.0% #91 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1975 13–27 32.5% #131 1,567 0 0 1968 23–16 59.0% — 1,599 0 0
25 1976 23–23 50.0% #77 1,750 0 0 1969 13–11 54.2% — 1,588 0 0
26 1977 14–21 40.0% #99 1,689 0 0 1970 8–14 36.4% — 1,572 0 0
27 1978 6–15 28.6% #205 1,581 0 0 1971 13–20 39.4% — 1,545 0 0
28 1979 6–13 31.6% #152 1,582 0 0 1972 11–19 36.7% — 1,577 0 0
29 1980 19–23 45.2% #134 1,613 0 0 1973 11–23 32.4% #99 1,550 0 0
30 1981 14–13 51.9% #82 1,655 0 0 1974 20–31 39.2% #66 1,613 0 0
31 1982 7–21 25.0% #99 1,497 0 0 1975 8–22 26.7% #138 1,581 0 0
32 1983 0–2 0.0% #210 1,472 0 0 1976 13–15 46.4% #108 1,626 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1977 14–14 50.0% #89 1,685 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 1978 6–16 27.3% #172 1,586 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Krulevitz Patricio Cornejo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 2 5 7 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 1968 — — — — 14 9 23 60.9% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — —
25 1976 5 4 9 55.6% 10 12 22 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1969 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1970 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
27 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1971 2 8 10 20.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1979 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 1980 10 8 18 55.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
30 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 4 8 12 33.3% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 6 15 21 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 14 14 28 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 50 83 39.8% 57 91 148 38.5% 14 21 35 40.0% 18 38 56 32.1% — 16 35 51 31.4% 93 111 204 45.6% 23 33 56 41.1% 8 22 30 26.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Krulevitz Patricio Cornejo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1969 1483 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1463 106.8 — — — — — — — 30.8% -1.46 0–1 1–0 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 1480 108.1 — — — — +41 +42 — 25.0% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 1455 104.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 1441 107.1 — — — — — — +60 30.8% -1.08 0–1 1–0 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 1540 121.2 — — — — -54 -3 +5 44.8% -0.37 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 101.0 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1975 1567 131.8 — — — — -46 -20 — 35.5% -0.75 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) 99.4 -1.61 1968 1599 110.9 — — — — — -20 +17 57.3% +0.36 3–6 (33%) — — +0.69
25 1976 1751 135.7 — — — — -83 -96 -195 49.1% -0.06 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 106.1 -0.29 1969 1588 105.3 — — — — — +6 -1 50.8% -0.09 5–2 (71%) — — +0.33
26 1977 1690 135.8 — — — — -58 -3 — 40.2% -0.52 4–4 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 98.7 -1.53 1970 1572 111.2 — — — — -22 +55 -55 39.7% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 99.0 -0.94
27 1978 1581 119.7 — — — — +15 +37 -43 30.0% -1.32 3–3 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.6 +0.20 1971 1545 115.2 — — — — -113 +126 -34 37.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 +0.48
28 1979 1582 119.9 — — — — +7 +10 -38 41.2% -0.59 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 94.6 +0.44 1972 1578 114.4 — — — — -121 +69 -54 40.8% -0.57 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.0 +0.46
29 1980 1614 129.7 — — — — +37 -48 — 46.0% -0.26 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 102.3 +2.70 1973 1550 122.5 — — — — -97 +55 — 34.2% -0.99 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 92.9 +0.03
30 1981 1655 121.0 — — — — +18 -18 — 49.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 5–2 (71%) 101.9 +1.99 1974 1613 135.5 — — — — -89 +62 -172 44.3% -0.19 6–11 (35%) 5–8 (38%) 96.6 -1.79
31 1982 1498 113.2 — — — — +18 +84 +43 33.8% -1.20 4–8 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 94.1 +0.91 1975 1581 135.2 — — — — -77 +40 -135 32.3% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -2.08
32 1983 1473 95.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.32 1976 1627 119.8 — — — — -51 -37 — 48.5% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 +1.82
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1686 123.4 — — — — — -6 — 46.4% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 1–5 (17%) 102.4 +1.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1587 122.9 — — — — — -12 — 30.2% -1.04 4–3 (57%) 1–5 (17%) 97.6 -1.19
Career — 1767 131.0 — — — — -17 -14 -19 40.9% -0.63 40–57 (41%) 39–41 (49%) 96.9 +1.05 — 1709 125.7 — — — — -88 +25 -28 42.9% -0.43 38–51 (43%) 25–46 (35%) 91.3 -0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.