H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Steve Shaw vs Huub Van Boeckel H2H: 0-1

Huub Van Boeckel holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Shaw in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Huub Van Boeckel leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Huub Van Boeckel won the 1985 Bristol round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Shaw
GBR Age 63 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Huub Van Boeckel
NED Age 66 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Huub Van Boeckel 6-3 6-2 Steve Shaw #110 Match data Jun 19, 1985* R64 Bristol ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Shaw #831 #88 7 1,614 23 41 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Huub Van Boeckel — — — 1,581 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Shaw Huub Van Boeckel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1984 3–5 37.5% #118 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1985 7–14 33.3% #197 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1986 0–3 0.0% #254 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1987 5–7 41.7% #162 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1988 8–11 42.1% #239 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Shaw Huub Van Boeckel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
25 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 8 9 17 47.1% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 19 27 29.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — 4 8 12 33.3% 4 11 15 26.7% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Shaw Huub Van Boeckel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1488 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08
21 1984 1536 106.7 — — — — — — +15 40.0% -0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 1482 110.5 — — — — +62 +31 -18 37.5% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 2–4 (33%) 101.9 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 1457 101.0 — — — — — — -42 22.2% -1.56 0–1 1–0 — -0.08 1983 1451 104.0 — — — — — — — 25.0% -0.83 0–2 0–2 — +0.02
24 1987 1511 120.1 — — — — — +24 -48 50.0% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 6–1 (86%) 102.4 +0.31 1984 1500 103.5 — — — — — — +60 52.2% +0.09 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +1.47
25 1988 1517 117.3 — — — — +66 -14 -18 45.8% -0.25 2–3 (40%) 4–5 (44%) 99.7 +1.05 1985 1526 112.3 — — — — +11 -23 +26 37.3% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 101.0 +1.79
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1513 101.1 — — — — +40 — — 28.6% -1.79 1–0 1–1 — +0.54
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1432 91.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.36 0–2 1–1 — +0.67
Career — 1614 116.6 — — — — +64 +20 -18 41.4% -0.63 6–10 (38%) 14–12 (54%) 102.5 +3.97 — 1582 105.5 — — — — +19 -23 +44 34.8% -1.05 9–10 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 98.2 +8.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.