H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sumit Nagal vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 0-1

Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 1–0 lead over Sumit Nagal in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2021 Argentina Open quarterfinal 4-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sumit Nagal
India Age 29 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #46 4-6 6-2 7-5 Sumit Nagal #150 Match data Mar 6, 2021* QF Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sumit Nagal #236 #68 779 1,641 9 35 20.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sumit Nagal Albert Ramos-Vinolas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2018 0–1 0.0% #340 1,450 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2019 0–2 0.0% #130 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2020 1–4 20.0% #136 1,564 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0
23 2021 3–7 30.0% #222 1,576 0 0 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0
25 2023 0–1 0.0% #138 1,507 0 0 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0
26 2024 5–16 23.8% #98 1,537 0 0 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0
27 2025 0–3 0.0% #277 1,530 0 0 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0
28 2026 0–1 0.0% #236 1,504 0 0 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sumit Nagal Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2024 1 8 9 11.1% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — —
27 2025 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 3 19 22 13.6% 6 15 21 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 41/44 of Sumit Nagal's and 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sumit Nagal Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2018 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.2% 48.6% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 49.3% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 2/2 1.0 4.0 61.5% 57.0% 46.2% 53.1% 36.5% 52.9% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 5/5 1.4 3.4 68.8% 64.1% 41.7% 51.0% 29.6% 57.0% 35.2% 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1%
23 2021 8/10 1.1 2.8 75.4% 55.7% 48.8% 43.6% 30.5% 54.7% 37.6% 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7%
25 2023 1/1 3.0 2.0 72.9% 68.6% 57.7% 71.4% 33.3% 65.6% 28.1% 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6%
26 2024 20/21 1.8 1.9 68.8% 60.9% 53.5% 58.7% 41.3% 58.5% 34.3% 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3%
27 2025 3/3 0.3 3.7 67.3% 60.0% 32.7% 50.3% 30.7% 50.7% 36.0% 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8%
28 2026 1/1 0.0 1.0 74.0% 57.0% 46.0% 60.0% 0.0% 54.0% 35.0% 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5%
Career — 41/44 1.4 2.5 69.5% 59.8% 49.1% 54.1% 35.7% 56.6% 35.0% — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sumit Nagal Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1483 92.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1475 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1451 103.4 -0.29 -2.23 0.618 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.26 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 1543 124.3 -0.61 +3.36 0.744 43.7% — — — 16.7% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.24 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 1564 119.4 -1.81 -0.59 0.818 45.9% +14 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–2 1–1 — -0.09 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
23 2021 1577 118.0 -2.98 -0.33 0.831 46.5% -35 +49 — 33.3% -1.38 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.30 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23
24 2022 1550 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55
25 2023 1508 105.9 -2.33 -4.01 0.817 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.14 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49
26 2024 1538 128.5 -3.74 -1.32 0.826 46.7% -46 +117 — 31.5% -1.13 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.68 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20
27 2025 1530 114.0 -1.97 -1.06 0.730 43.7% — — — 12.5% -2.63 0–1 1–0 — -0.44 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24
28 2026 1505 103.5 +2.63 -1.19 0.761 44.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.13 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39
Career — 1642 124.3 -2.80 -0.88 0.806 46.0% -29 +93 — 28.9% -1.45 4–10 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 95.0 -2.64 — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.