H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Sumit Nagal vs Denis Istomin H2H: 1-0
Sumit Nagal holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sumit Nagal leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sumit Nagal won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics second round 6-4 6-7(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
India
Age 28
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2021* | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Sumit Nagal | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sumit Nagal | #230 | #68 | 779 | 1,641 | 9 | 35 | 20.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,903 | 193 | 248 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sumit Nagal | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #222 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #98 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,575 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |