H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
T. Hogstedt vs J. Kriek H2H: 0-3
J. Kriek holds a 3–0 lead over T. Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, J. Kriek leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, J. Kriek won the 1988 Schenectady semifinal 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1988* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | J. Kriek | 6-0 6-2 | T. Hogstedt | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1984* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | J. Kriek | 7-5 7-6 | T. Hogstedt | Match data |
| Dec 30, 1981* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | J. Kriek | 6-2 6-4 7-6 | T. Hogstedt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| J. Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | T. Hogstedt | J. Kriek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 |
| 25 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 |
| 27 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 |
| 28 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 |
| 30 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 |