H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
T. Smid vs Peter Mcnamara H2H: 1-4
Peter Mcnamara holds a 4–1 lead over T. Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Peter Mcnamara leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Peter Mcnamara won the 1983 Philadelphia fourth round 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1983* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Peter Mcnamara | 7-6 6-0 | T. Smid | Match data |
| May 30, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Peter Mcnamara | 2-6 6-1 7-6 6-3 | T. Smid | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1981* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Peter Mcnamara | 6-2 6-4 | T. Smid | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1980* | Vienna | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | T. Smid | 6-4 (ret.) | Peter Mcnamara | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1979* | Berlin | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Peter Mcnamara | 6-4 2-6 1-6 6-1 6-3 | T. Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Peter Mcnamara | — | — | — | 2,068 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | T. Smid | Peter Mcnamara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |