H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Takao Suzuki vs Amir Hadad.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amir Hadad | 7-5 6-3 | Takao Suzuki | Match data | May 28, 2002* | Q3 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amir Hadad | #1,591 | #180 | 196 | 1,582 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Takao Suzuki | Amir Hadad | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Takao Suzuki | Amir Hadad | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 22 | 29 | 51 | 43.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Takao Suzuki | Amir Hadad | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 56.1% | 67.0% | 48.4% | 60.1% | 46.4% | 58.9% | 46.3% |
| 26 | 2003 | 7/7 | 7.7 | 3.1 | 58.1% | 73.1% | 52.8% | 74.9% | 39.7% | 65.0% | 34.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 5/5 | 11.8 | 3.8 | 62.6% | 75.8% | 48.5% | 49.7% | 52.6% | 65.6% | 32.4% | 2005 | 4/4 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 65.3% | 64.6% | 53.1% | 62.5% | 38.1% | 59.3% | 29.2% |
| 28 | 2005 | 3/3 | 10.3 | 2.7 | 64.5% | 73.2% | 58.4% | 82.3% | 63.9% | 67.6% | 29.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 4/4 | 12.8 | 2.5 | 62.7% | 80.9% | 66.7% | 87.5% | 50.0% | 75.5% | 29.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 1/1 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 54.3% | 76.5% | 60.5% | 50.0% | 14.3% | 69.1% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 3/3 | 12.0 | 2.3 | 60.0% | 77.6% | 50.9% | 68.4% | 44.4% | 66.4% | 33.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 60.9% | 57.1% | 72.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 63.0% | 26.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 24/57 | 10.3 | 3.0 | 60.8% | 75.0% | 55.8% | 67.7% | 45.0% | 67.5% | 31.9% | — | 6/6 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 62.2% | 65.4% | 51.5% | 61.7% | 40.9% | 59.2% | 34.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Takao Suzuki | Amir Hadad | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1473 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1493 | 109.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1507 | 105.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 1545 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 44.4% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 1462 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.20 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–6 (14%) | 91.0 | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 1477 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.83 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 1517 | 105.7 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.21 | 2–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.26 | 2002 | 1557 | 112.6 | +0.10 | -2.19 | 1.128 | 53.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.18 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1506 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.93 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.27 | 2003 | 1521 | 95.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 1609 | 114.1 | -2.01 | -0.21 | 0.982 | 49.9% | -33 | — | — | 56.3% | -0.13 | — | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.23 | 2004 | 1537 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 1611 | 113.5 | +1.14 | -2.01 | 0.942 | 49.1% | +12 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.86 | 1–1 | 4–2 (67%) | — | -0.08 | 2005 | 1548 | 104.9 | -0.44 | -2.69 | 0.718 | 45.1% | +27 | — | — | 44.4% | -1.22 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.44 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1588 | 114.1 | -0.19 | +2.68 | 0.913 | 49.3% | +55 | — | — | 44.4% | +0.22 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.25 | 2006 | 1531 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1619 | 124.5 | +2.96 | -0.08 | 1.193 | 53.1% | +51 | — | — | 63.6% | +1.28 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–3 (40%) | 102.8 | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 1544 | 100.8 | -3.25 | +0.61 | 1.049 | 50.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 1543 | 102.7 | +1.12 | -0.43 | 0.981 | 50.2% | +54 | — | — | 62.5% | -0.13 | 1–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 1541 | 112.1 | +2.43 | +1.00 | 0.722 | 42.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 1546 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 1528 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 1512 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2015 | 1508 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1669 | 118.5 | +0.23 | -0.15 | 0.981 | 49.9% | +27 | — | — | 43.2% | -0.56 | 9–11 (45%) | 18–15 (55%) | 105.7 | +0.21 | — | 1583 | 106.4 | -0.26 | -2.52 | 0.856 | 47.8% | +27 | — | — | 47.1% | -0.23 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +10.33 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paradorn Srichaphan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 5, 2006 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 7, 2006 | H2H |
| Alexander Waske | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 6, 2006 | H2H |
| Wayne Arthurs | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 5, 2005 | H2H |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jan 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 16, 2005 | H2H |
| Dick Norman | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 15, 2005 | H2H |
| Ricardo Mello | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 29, 2005 | H2H |
| Cecil Mamiit | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jul 28, 2005 | H2H |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 31, 2002 | H2H |