H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Brian Vahaly in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2002 Japan Open round of 32 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Takao Suzuki | 6-3 7-6(3) | Brian Vahaly | Match data | Oct 3, 2002* | R32 | Japan Open | ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brian Vahaly | #1,056 | #64 | 641 | 1,641 | 21 | 43 | 32.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Takao Suzuki | Brian Vahaly | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #102 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #237 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #578 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Takao Suzuki | Brian Vahaly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 22 | 29 | 51 | 43.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | 17 | 31 | 48 | 35.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's and 63/64 of Brian Vahaly's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Takao Suzuki | Brian Vahaly | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12/13 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 60.0% | 66.5% | 51.1% | 56.7% | 47.4% | 60.5% | 40.0% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 35/35 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 67.7% | 64.6% | 52.6% | 50.9% | 36.4% | 60.6% | 36.9% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 11/11 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 61.0% | 61.8% | 48.5% | 51.9% | 29.9% | 56.7% | 35.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 70.2% | 65.3% | 47.6% | 52.8% | 61.9% | 60.0% | 36.7% |
| 26 | 2003 | 7/7 | 7.7 | 3.1 | 58.1% | 73.1% | 52.8% | 74.9% | 39.7% | 65.0% | 34.3% | 2006 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 55.5% | 55.2% | 59.6% | 55.8% | 16.7% | 56.9% | 26.9% |
| 27 | 2004 | 5/5 | 11.8 | 3.8 | 62.6% | 75.8% | 48.5% | 49.7% | 52.6% | 65.6% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 3/3 | 10.3 | 2.7 | 64.5% | 73.2% | 58.4% | 82.3% | 63.9% | 67.6% | 29.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 4/4 | 12.8 | 2.5 | 62.7% | 80.9% | 66.7% | 87.5% | 50.0% | 75.5% | 29.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 1/1 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 54.3% | 76.5% | 60.5% | 50.0% | 14.3% | 69.1% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 3/3 | 12.0 | 2.3 | 60.0% | 77.6% | 50.9% | 68.4% | 44.4% | 66.4% | 33.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 60.9% | 57.1% | 72.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 63.0% | 26.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 24/57 | 10.3 | 3.0 | 60.8% | 75.0% | 55.8% | 67.7% | 45.0% | 67.5% | 31.9% | — | 63/64 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 64.8% | 64.2% | 51.6% | 52.4% | 37.9% | 59.8% | 36.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Takao Suzuki | Brian Vahaly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1473 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1493 | 109.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1507 | 105.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | -0.04 | 2000 | 1486 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 1545 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 44.4% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.29 | 2001 | 1469 | 87.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 1462 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.20 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–6 (14%) | 91.0 | -0.13 | 2002 | 1526 | 120.5 | -1.01 | +1.22 | 1.011 | 50.1% | +28 | — | +19 | 45.5% | -0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–4 (20%) | 99.9 | +0.57 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1477 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.83 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.17 | 2003 | 1513 | 128.2 | -1.41 | -0.18 | 0.937 | 48.7% | +52 | -24 | -23 | 36.7% | -0.69 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–5 (44%) | 99.4 | +0.92 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1517 | 105.7 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.21 | 2–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.26 | 2004 | 1436 | 102.3 | -4.21 | +0.03 | 0.824 | 46.0% | +22 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.46 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 93.6 | +0.35 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1506 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.93 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.27 | 2005 | 1438 | 99.9 | -0.79 | -1.11 | 0.916 | 48.8% | -5 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.22 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1609 | 114.1 | -2.01 | -0.21 | 0.982 | 49.9% | -33 | — | — | 56.3% | -0.13 | — | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.23 | 2006 | 1418 | 95.4 | -0.10 | -0.07 | 0.624 | 42.8% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.80 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.12 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1611 | 113.5 | +1.14 | -2.01 | 0.942 | 49.1% | +12 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.86 | 1–1 | 4–2 (67%) | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 1588 | 114.1 | -0.19 | +2.68 | 0.913 | 49.3% | +55 | — | — | 44.4% | +0.22 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1619 | 124.5 | +2.96 | -0.08 | 1.193 | 53.1% | +51 | — | — | 63.6% | +1.28 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–3 (40%) | 102.8 | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 1544 | 100.8 | -3.25 | +0.61 | 1.049 | 50.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 1543 | 102.7 | +1.12 | -0.43 | 0.981 | 50.2% | +54 | — | — | 62.5% | -0.13 | 1–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 1541 | 112.1 | +2.43 | +1.00 | 0.722 | 42.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 1546 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 1528 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 1512 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2015 | 1508 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1669 | 118.5 | +0.23 | -0.15 | 0.981 | 49.9% | +27 | — | — | 43.2% | -0.56 | 9–11 (45%) | 18–15 (55%) | 105.7 | +0.21 | — | 1641 | 116.8 | -1.75 | +0.08 | 0.918 | 48.3% | +38 | -24 | -7 | 36.8% | -0.73 | 9–14 (39%) | 7–13 (35%) | 95.4 | +3.41 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paradorn Srichaphan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 5, 2006 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 7, 2006 | H2H |
| Alexander Waske | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 6, 2006 | H2H |
| Wayne Arthurs | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 5, 2005 | H2H |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jan 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 9, 2004 | H2H |
| James Blake | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 3, 2006 | H2H |
| Kenneth Carlsen | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 4, 2005 | H2H |
| Robert Kendrick | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 3, 2005 | H2H |
| Fernando Gonzalez | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 13, 2003 | H2H |