H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Takao Suzuki vs Dinu Pescariu H2H: 1-0

Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Dinu Pescariu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 1999 Memphis round of 64 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Dinu Pescariu
ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Takao Suzuki #116 6-4 6-4 Dinu Pescariu #107 Match data Feb 17, 1999* R64 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dinu Pescariu #1,034 #75 629 1,578 23 56 29.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Takao Suzuki Dinu Pescariu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #410 1,502 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 3–3 50.0% #169 1,551 0 0
18 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #217 1,544 0 0
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #268 1,563 0 0
20 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #406 1,560 0 0
21 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #137 1,537 0 0
22 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #174 1,506 0 0
23 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0 1997 3–13 18.8% #80 1,479 0 0
24 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0 1998 5–15 25.0% #108 1,470 0 0
25 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0 1999 3–10 23.1% #171 1,440 0 0
26 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #555 1,442 0 0
27 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,437 0 0
28 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Takao Suzuki Dinu Pescariu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 3 11 14 21.4% 19 39 58 32.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's and 67/76 of Dinu Pescariu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Takao Suzuki Dinu Pescariu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 5/6 0.6 2.2 68.1% 56.9% 46.5% 63.6% 61.3% 53.6% 40.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 2/3 1.5 1.0 52.7% 59.2% 37.4% 54.4% 77.3% 48.1% 43.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 2/3 2.0 0.0 49.6% 77.0% 56.0% 35.0% 27.8% 66.4% 32.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 2/2 4.5 2.5 56.9% 70.3% 57.4% 50.0% 22.7% 64.7% 41.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 4/4 3.0 1.3 61.6% 65.1% 42.2% 56.6% 61.1% 56.3% 38.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 6/7 2.5 3.2 59.7% 63.4% 50.7% 58.1% 34.0% 58.4% 40.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 14/16 2.6 3.0 73.5% 57.7% 44.4% 48.0% 31.7% 54.1% 36.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 19/20 2.7 3.0 68.3% 61.7% 45.6% 51.5% 50.7% 56.8% 37.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 11/13 2.9 3.0 64.4% 62.2% 44.1% 55.8% 46.2% 55.5% 38.2%
26 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3% 2000 2/2 1.0 0.5 69.3% 65.0% 52.7% 48.6% 15.4% 61.1% 34.4%
27 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9% — 67/79 2.5 2.6 66.2% 61.7% 46.0% 52.7% 44.1% 56.3% 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Takao Suzuki Dinu Pescariu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1502 101.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1551 116.8 -1.53 +0.01 0.862 47.7% — +46 — 30.0% -1.70 0–1 — — -0.03
18 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 1992 1544 98.9 -0.24 -4.86 0.835 45.7% — — — 28.6% -2.28 1–0 1–0 — +0.10
19 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 1993 1564 111.4 +1.35 -0.80 0.975 48.4% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.30
20 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04 1994 1560 103.8 +0.96 -0.67 1.180 54.1% — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.33
21 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29 1995 1537 101.8 -1.86 -0.70 0.874 47.2% — +20 — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — -0.01
22 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 -0.13 1996 1507 104.1 -1.37 -1.92 0.985 49.7% -14 +60 — 31.3% -1.13 1–1 1–0 — +0.86
23 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17 1997 1479 123.9 -4.19 -0.31 0.793 45.6% +32 +44 — 31.1% -1.31 1–7 (13%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.47
24 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26 1998 1470 120.2 -3.43 -0.88 0.855 47.5% 0 +28 — 28.6% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 1–6 (14%) 96.7 +0.09
25 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27 1999 1441 113.8 -2.64 -0.50 0.857 47.1% — +56 — 27.3% -1.39 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.0 +0.14
26 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23 2000 1442 101.6 +0.43 -0.83 0.885 46.6% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — 0.00
27 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08 2001 1437 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.12
28 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +49 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21 — 1579 121.3 -2.55 -0.82 0.865 47.4% +12 +41 — 30.7% -1.23 7–14 (33%) 10–14 (42%) 98.8 +0.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.