H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Takao Suzuki vs Lars Burgsmuller H2H: 1-0

Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Lars Burgsmuller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2003 Shanghai Masters round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lars Burgsmuller
GER Age 50 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Takao Suzuki #212 6-4 6-1 Lars Burgsmuller #83 Match data Sep 25, 2003* R32 Shanghai Masters ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lars Burgsmuller #1,129 #65 596 1,747 87 149 36.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Takao Suzuki Lars Burgsmuller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #203 1,475 0 0
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #162 1,482 0 0
20 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0 1996 6–6 50.0% #145 1,538 0 0
21 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0 1997 3–3 50.0% #165 1,543 0 0
22 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0 1998 7–12 36.8% #134 1,563 0 0
23 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0 1999 7–8 46.7% #134 1,593 0 0
24 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #178 1,611 0 0
25 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0 2001 14–19 42.4% #83 1,600 0 0
26 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0 2002 14–21 40.0% #76 1,564 0 1
27 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0 2003 15–22 40.5% #76 1,614 0 1
28 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0 2004 8–19 29.6% #100 1,532 0 1
29 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0 2005 6–21 22.2% #141 1,463 0 1
30 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0 2006 4–7 36.4% #177 1,495 0 1
31 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #426 1,426 0 1
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Takao Suzuki Lars Burgsmuller
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 8 13 21 38.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 51 79 130 39.2% 17 41 58 29.3% 8 18 26 30.8% 11 11 22 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's and 221/236 of Lars Burgsmuller's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Takao Suzuki Lars Burgsmuller
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 2/2 3.5 3.0 60.2% 61.6% 48.1% 29.2% 39.7% 56.3% 41.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 3/4 5.3 5.3 61.6% 55.0% 42.1% 52.6% 54.3% 50.1% 40.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/12 3.7 2.7 64.3% 70.9% 51.8% 62.9% 48.1% 64.1% 36.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 5/6 3.8 2.0 65.6% 69.2% 53.4% 55.0% 52.0% 63.7% 37.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 16/19 3.3 3.6 58.5% 65.8% 47.2% 56.2% 43.9% 58.0% 39.8%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 15/15 3.3 4.0 61.1% 67.1% 49.7% 59.6% 50.2% 60.8% 40.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 6/7 2.0 2.3 58.7% 61.3% 48.5% 55.5% 43.3% 56.3% 35.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 30/33 3.2 3.8 59.0% 67.3% 49.9% 57.3% 38.9% 60.1% 37.9%
26 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3% 2002 31/35 3.8 2.9 56.3% 68.9% 48.6% 57.9% 43.3% 59.9% 37.6%
27 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4% 2003 37/37 5.4 4.0 56.2% 70.1% 49.1% 55.8% 43.2% 61.1% 35.2%
28 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6% 2004 27/27 3.4 3.4 58.1% 66.1% 45.0% 50.9% 39.5% 57.3% 33.6%
29 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2% 2005 27/27 4.0 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 43.4% 42.5% 39.9% 56.1% 33.5%
30 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4% 2006 11/11 4.0 4.0 59.0% 69.6% 48.8% 59.1% 34.6% 61.2% 35.7%
31 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0% 2007 1/1 1.0 8.0 67.8% 62.7% 42.9% 60.0% 50.0% 56.3% 32.4%
32 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9% — 221/236 3.8 3.6 58.2% 67.6% 47.9% 54.6% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Takao Suzuki Lars Burgsmuller
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 1994 1476 100.4 +0.03 -0.80 0.952 47.8% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.16
19 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 1995 1482 108.0 -1.14 -1.45 0.811 45.7% +53 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.05
20 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04 1996 1538 118.7 +0.81 -1.19 1.003 50.3% +80 -62 — 48.3% +0.24 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 100.4 +0.61
21 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29 1997 1544 106.3 0.00 -0.39 1.043 51.0% +60 — — 46.2% 0.00 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.97
22 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 -0.13 1998 1563 128.2 -1.56 +1.07 0.949 48.9% +61 — — 40.0% -0.40 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 -0.11
23 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17 1999 1593 121.2 -1.41 +1.27 1.043 50.9% +32 -93 — 45.5% +0.23 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +0.63
24 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26 2000 1611 114.4 -1.22 -0.85 0.816 46.0% +27 — — 20.0% -1.67 1–1 0–1 — -0.44
25 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27 2001 1600 125.2 -1.88 -0.37 0.950 48.9% +38 -48 -96 40.7% -0.63 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 100.1 -0.40
26 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23 2002 1564 130.1 -1.79 -0.21 0.940 49.0% +64 -26 — 42.7% -0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 +0.97
27 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08 2003 1614 116.1 -0.79 -1.83 0.905 48.3% -19 -64 -113 43.0% -0.65 6–8 (43%) 6–4 (60%) 100.9 +0.12
28 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25 2004 1533 105.7 -4.09 -2.36 0.787 45.7% +15 +1 -76 31.8% -1.27 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.0 +1.23
29 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +49 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +0.05 2005 1463 107.9 -4.62 -2.59 0.763 45.2% -24 +31 +13 26.6% -1.69 3–3 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 100.0 +0.70
30 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2006 1495 109.8 -1.31 -0.91 0.920 48.4% -10 — — 37.9% -0.62 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 +0.43
31 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15 2007 1427 98.9 -3.45 -0.62 0.741 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.16
32 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10 2008 1413 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21 — 1747 122.3 -2.00 -0.99 0.897 48.0% +28 -32 -62 38.6% -0.67 36–37 (49%) 27–42 (39%) 96.5 +2.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.