H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Takao Suzuki vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 0-1

Paul Goldstein holds a 1–0 lead over Takao Suzuki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Goldstein leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Goldstein won the 2004 US Open round of 128 7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Paul Goldstein
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Goldstein #157 7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 6-1 Takao Suzuki #201 Match data Sep 1, 2004* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Paul Goldstein #1,120 #58 668 1,747 85 115 42.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Takao Suzuki Paul Goldstein
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,465 0 0
18 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% — 1,453 0 0
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,437 0 0
20 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0 1998 1–3 25.0% #189 1,464 0 0
22 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0 1999 12–15 44.4% #89 1,615 0 0
23 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0 2000 20–23 46.5% #81 1,634 0 0
24 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0 2001 5–10 33.3% #143 1,583 0 0
25 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0 2002 1–3 25.0% #182 1,562 0 0
26 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0 2003 4–5 44.4% #107 1,540 0 0
27 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0 2004 4–6 40.0% #190 1,586 0 0
28 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0 2005 13–12 52.0% #67 1,626 0 0
29 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0 2006 16–21 43.2% #70 1,594 0 0
30 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0 2007 9–13 40.9% #166 1,575 0 0
31 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Takao Suzuki Paul Goldstein
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1999 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 13 16 29 44.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 12 14 26 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 62 86 148 41.9% 10 15 25 40.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's and 184/199 of Paul Goldstein's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Takao Suzuki Paul Goldstein
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 1/1 0.0 1.0 69.7% 54.8% 44.4% 57.1% 20.0% 51.7% 26.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 1/1 2.0 2.0 62.7% 67.3% 45.2% 54.5% 66.7% 59.0% 37.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 1/1 3.0 2.0 59.4% 68.4% 53.8% 66.7% 18.2% 62.5% 37.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 4/4 4.0 3.0 59.9% 68.8% 48.0% 48.1% 28.2% 61.6% 32.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 23/27 2.5 2.9 63.9% 63.7% 46.9% 55.3% 48.7% 57.6% 42.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 36/43 2.4 2.3 62.8% 64.7% 49.7% 57.3% 41.4% 58.6% 39.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 12/15 2.1 2.0 60.7% 59.1% 48.2% 52.8% 38.5% 54.9% 38.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/4 2.7 3.7 60.0% 63.7% 45.9% 68.4% 36.3% 56.2% 35.8%
26 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3% 2003 9/9 2.8 2.4 59.3% 66.3% 50.4% 57.6% 48.6% 60.1% 42.4%
27 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4% 2004 10/10 3.3 3.0 64.1% 66.7% 48.3% 56.4% 47.2% 59.6% 37.2%
28 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6% 2005 25/25 2.3 3.4 59.0% 67.6% 48.2% 51.7% 43.1% 59.6% 40.4%
29 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2% 2006 37/37 1.9 2.4 59.2% 66.5% 48.8% 58.1% 44.7% 59.3% 39.2%
30 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4% 2007 22/22 2.1 3.2 62.9% 62.4% 45.3% 55.2% 43.8% 55.9% 39.8%
31 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9% — 184/200 2.4 2.7 61.4% 64.9% 48.2% 55.9% 43.5% 58.3% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Takao Suzuki Paul Goldstein
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1480 96.3 -1.25 -0.99 0.555 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1466 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — +0.05
18 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 1995 1454 98.3 -2.52 +1.04 0.908 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.07
19 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 1996 1437 99.1 -1.49 -0.96 1.003 49.7% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.22
20 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29 1998 1464 116.1 +0.48 +0.18 0.851 46.6% +20 — — 22.2% -1.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.36
22 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 -0.13 1999 1615 134.5 -2.78 +2.98 0.993 49.9% -8 — +26 49.4% +0.03 3–7 (30%) 6–6 (50%) 99.2 +0.07
23 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17 2000 1634 125.2 -2.64 +0.82 0.941 48.8% -14 -121 +16 47.2% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 103.4 +1.47
24 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26 2001 1583 118.8 -2.75 +0.57 0.853 46.9% +6 — — 34.3% -0.91 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.16
25 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27 2002 1562 103.4 -3.43 +1.01 0.817 46.5% +1 — — 30.0% -1.60 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.45
26 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23 2003 1540 115.9 -1.18 +3.01 1.062 51.6% +5 — — 47.6% +0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.28
27 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08 2004 1586 123.4 -2.53 +1.52 0.922 48.8% +12 — — 42.3% -0.46 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.4 -0.62
28 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25 2005 1627 126.5 -3.11 +2.08 1.000 50.1% +10 — +12 51.6% +0.02 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.8 +1.15
29 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +0.05 2006 1594 134.5 -2.32 +1.72 0.962 49.1% +50 -55 -8 40.0% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.34
30 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2007 1576 121.5 -4.78 +1.85 0.902 48.2% +30 -54 — 45.1% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 +0.76
31 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21 — 1747 131.4 -2.77 +1.67 0.947 49.0% +12 -86 +12 44.0% -0.34 23–36 (39%) 26–32 (45%) 95.8 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.