H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Takao Suzuki vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-0

Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2001 Japan Open round of 32 7-5 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Takao Suzuki #418 7-5 4-6 6-4 Sargis Sargsian #91 Match data Oct 4, 2001* R32 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 156 208 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Takao Suzuki Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0 1996 4–6 40.0% #104 1,576 0 0
24 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,628 0 1
25 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,617 0 1
26 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,636 0 1
27 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0 2000 15–26 36.6% #94 1,566 0 1
28 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,624 0 1
29 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,649 0 1
30 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0 2004 17–27 38.6% #75 1,697 0 1
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,589 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Takao Suzuki Sargis Sargsian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 6 12 18 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
31 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 68 103 171 39.8% 45 58 103 43.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 15 17 32 46.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's and 313/364 of Sargis Sargsian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Takao Suzuki Sargis Sargsian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 2/2 1.0 3.0 62.4% 56.6% 57.6% 68.3% 34.5% 57.6% 36.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/4 5.0 7.0 57.5% 78.7% 29.9% 46.7% 47.4% 58.4% 33.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 7/10 2.1 4.0 58.5% 69.3% 46.1% 51.7% 41.0% 60.0% 42.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 31/41 4.3 3.4 58.0% 66.1% 50.7% 54.6% 38.3% 59.6% 35.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 33/43 4.5 3.1 60.5% 71.0% 50.9% 61.1% 43.1% 63.0% 38.8%
26 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3% 1999 33/44 3.8 2.5 60.7% 70.1% 50.3% 68.4% 40.9% 62.0% 39.0%
27 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4% 2000 33/41 3.7 3.0 60.4% 66.5% 45.5% 55.1% 39.0% 58.0% 38.0%
28 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6% 2001 32/35 3.7 3.3 59.1% 68.7% 48.5% 54.0% 46.3% 60.2% 38.1%
29 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2% 2002 29/32 5.0 3.2 56.7% 67.3% 49.4% 51.7% 39.2% 59.6% 34.2%
30 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4% 2003 54/54 4.1 3.4 61.7% 69.5% 51.8% 57.0% 47.3% 62.8% 39.6%
31 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0% 2004 43/44 4.8 3.0 63.2% 67.8% 48.6% 52.9% 33.9% 60.3% 36.8%
32 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7% 2005 12/12 3.0 4.3 59.9% 56.7% 37.4% 46.5% 49.0% 48.7% 30.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 0.5 6.5 60.0% 56.3% 39.5% 57.7% 16.7% 49.5% 28.9%
Career — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9% — 313/364 4.1 3.2 60.3% 67.9% 48.9% 56.3% 41.4% 60.3% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Takao Suzuki Sargis Sargsian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04 1993 1514 106.3 -1.99 -0.78 0.850 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
21 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 -0.13 1995 1568 112.7 -0.77 +0.75 0.802 46.7% +23 — — 40.0% -0.73 2–0 1–0 — -0.16
23 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17 1996 1577 128.3 -1.13 +3.09 1.060 51.0% +44 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
24 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26 1997 1628 125.8 -1.73 -0.98 0.881 47.6% -2 -131 +80 42.7% -0.72 7–9 (44%) 10–6 (63%) 106.1 -0.39
25 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27 1998 1618 121.9 +0.65 +0.48 1.050 50.9% -61 -75 +114 46.4% -0.07 6–11 (35%) 8–12 (40%) 92.3 +1.49
26 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23 1999 1637 132.5 +0.09 +1.23 1.029 50.7% -86 +41 +71 49.1% -0.06 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) 95.6 -0.70
27 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08 2000 1566 128.7 -2.68 +0.64 0.906 47.9% -40 +100 +90 37.0% -0.66 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 98.9 +1.47
28 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25 2001 1625 130.0 -2.01 +0.60 0.956 49.3% -63 +51 +50 46.7% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 100.6 +0.20
29 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +0.05 2002 1650 127.4 -1.35 -1.75 0.846 47.0% -4 -26 -15 41.7% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 103.1 -0.86
30 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2003 1775 142.7 +1.40 +2.44 1.066 51.2% -3 -112 -142 53.7% +0.49 4–6 (40%) 4–8 (33%) 96.5 -1.63
31 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15 2004 1697 135.9 -1.71 +0.83 0.929 48.5% +25 -58 -94 40.7% -0.52 8–6 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 102.9 -2.22
32 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10 2005 1589 91.9 -8.24 -4.38 0.602 40.3% +84 +23 -61 22.2% -2.26 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.23
33 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1577 106.8 -0.31 -1.11 0.571 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.39
34 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21 — 1812 135.5 -1.06 +0.48 0.943 48.9% -15 -12 +31 44.2% -0.34 49–64 (43%) 60–59 (50%) 99.6 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.