H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tarik Benhabiles vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 0-2
Joakim Nystrom holds a 2–0 lead over Tarik Benhabiles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joakim Nystrom leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1986 Monte Carlo fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 1986* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Joakim Nystrom | 6-1 6-2 | Tarik Benhabiles | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1985* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Joakim Nystrom | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Tarik Benhabiles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarik Benhabiles | #1,262 | #22 | 387 | 1,767 | 69 | 105 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,114 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tarik Benhabiles | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #616 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #71 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #230 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,912 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1989 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #107 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,729 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 1991 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #177 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |