H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tarik Benhabiles vs Marko Ostoja H2H: 1-1
Tarik Benhabiles and Marko Ostoja are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marko Ostoja leads 1–0 on carpet, while Tarik Benhabiles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tarik Benhabiles won the 1985 Delray Beach second round 6-7 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1985* | Delray Beach | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tarik Benhabiles | 6-7 6-4 6-2 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1985* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Marko Ostoja | 6-4 6-2 | Tarik Benhabiles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarik Benhabiles | #1,262 | #22 | 387 | 1,767 | 69 | 105 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tarik Benhabiles | Marko Ostoja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #616 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #71 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #230 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #107 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #177 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |