H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Taro Daniel vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #88 3-6 6-3 7-6(2) Taro Daniel #72 Match data May 5, 2019* Q1 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #160 #58 893 1,815 83 149 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel Albert Ramos-Vinolas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #160 1,534 0 1 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — —
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — —
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 48 86 134 35.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6%
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3%
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8%
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7%
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9%
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7%
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8%
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9%
33 2026 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.0% 62.0% 54.0% 67.0% 20.0% 59.0% 33.0% 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5%
Career — 227/232 3.9 2.5 62.1% 66.4% 49.4% 55.1% 40.9% 59.9% 34.9% — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.49 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.54 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.14 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.55 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.01 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.98 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — -1.01 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07
33 2026 1535 107.9 +2.06 -1.39 0.805 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39
Career — 1816 134.0 -2.66 -0.57 0.871 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.4% -0.80 32–44 (42%) 43–52 (45%) 96.1 -0.26 — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.