H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Denis Istomin H2H: 1-1
Taro Daniel and Denis Istomin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2016 Montpellier third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2016* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 6-2 6-2 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2014* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Denis Istomin | 7-6(2) 6-7(5) 7-5 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |