H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Facundo Bagnis H2H: 0-1
Facundo Bagnis holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Facundo Bagnis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Facundo Bagnis won the 2021 US Open first round 6-3 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Facundo Bagnis | 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2016* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2015 | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 0-6 6-3 6-2 | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |