H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs Jerzy Janowicz H2H: 1-1

Taro Daniel and Jerzy Janowicz are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2017 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jerzy Janowicz
POL Age 35 Right-Handed 203 cm / 6'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Taro Daniel #102 6-4 6-4 6-4 Jerzy Janowicz #164 Match data May 30, 2017* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jerzy Janowicz #51 6-4 6-3 Taro Daniel #112 Match data Jul 30, 2015* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #160 #58 893 1,815 83 149 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jerzy Janowicz #735 #14 2,154 1,962 80 85 48.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel Jerzy Janowicz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #339 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #319 1,575 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #161 1,572 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #221 1,547 0 0
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 2012 9–4 69.2% #26 1,834 0 0
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2013 23–20 53.5% #21 1,912 0 0
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2014 22–24 47.8% #43 1,849 0 0
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2015 20–22 47.6% #57 1,789 0 0
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 2016 0–3 0.0% #280 1,768 0 0
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 2017 6–6 50.0% #123 1,740 0 0
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #160 1,534 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel Jerzy Janowicz
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 17 15 32 53.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 14 13 27 51.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2017 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 86 134 35.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — 51 51 102 50.0% 13 24 37 35.1% 16 10 26 61.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 164/165 of Jerzy Janowicz's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel Jerzy Janowicz
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 1.0 52.8% 68.4% 38.2% 42.9% 25.0% 54.2% 24.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 11.5 1.5 56.4% 75.2% 54.2% 56.9% 44.3% 66.0% 33.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 1.5 5.0 62.5% 67.3% 49.1% 51.7% 12.5% 60.5% 31.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 8.0 8.0 67.9% 76.4% 47.1% 81.8% 50.0% 67.0% 25.3%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% 2012 13/13 12.3 3.6 62.3% 81.2% 59.3% 52.8% 44.2% 72.8% 34.2%
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2013 43/43 10.7 5.3 60.7% 76.5% 51.2% 64.4% 40.9% 66.5% 34.6%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2014 46/46 8.6 6.7 59.5% 73.5% 47.6% 56.7% 40.5% 63.0% 33.8%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2015 42/42 9.3 4.5 65.7% 71.0% 47.0% 63.6% 36.7% 62.7% 33.8%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% 2016 2/3 7.5 8.5 59.0% 68.6% 46.8% 57.5% 16.7% 59.7% 23.4%
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% 2017 12/12 9.8 3.8 62.0% 78.8% 52.3% 59.7% 35.4% 68.7% 27.9%
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.0% 62.0% 54.0% 67.0% 20.0% 59.0% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227/232 3.9 2.5 62.1% 66.4% 49.4% 55.1% 40.9% 59.9% 34.9% — 164/165 9.6 5.2 61.8% 74.5% 49.7% 60.4% 38.9% 65.0% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel Jerzy Janowicz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1496 105.5 +3.34 -3.71 0.524 41.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1576 113.5 +1.45 -1.41 0.983 50.2% — — — 33.3% +0.17 0–2 0–2 — -0.07
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1573 104.6 -0.36 -1.36 0.802 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.16
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1547 107.6 +0.31 -3.01 0.766 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2012 1834 139.1 +6.45 -0.74 1.259 52.6% -53 — -71 60.0% +0.46 2–1 (67%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.87
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2013 1912 158.2 +3.46 -0.94 1.034 50.5% -106 -126 +8 54.4% +0.11 7–8 (47%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.48
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.49 2014 1849 151.0 -0.28 -1.76 0.915 48.7% +3 -103 +58 48.0% -0.30 10–8 (56%) 13–11 (54%) — +0.19
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 2015 1790 145.4 -0.74 -1.43 0.907 48.4% +32 -73 +74 46.8% -0.18 9–7 (56%) 9–14 (39%) — +0.89
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.54 2016 1769 132.5 -0.92 +4.11 0.579 42.5% +25 — — 20.0% -2.10 0–1 0–2 — -0.86
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.14 2017 1741 123.1 +3.55 -3.32 0.892 48.8% +37 — +77 47.2% -0.33 2–2 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.91
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1535 107.9 +2.05 -1.38 0.805 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1816 134.0 -2.66 -0.57 0.871 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.4% -0.80 32–44 (42%) 43–52 (45%) 96.1 -0.26 — 1962 147.6 +1.43 -1.43 0.953 49.3% -17 -104 +38 48.7% -0.17 30–30 (50%) 46–47 (49%) 103.8 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.