H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 0-1
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2019 Brisbane fourth round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 |