H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Juan Martin del Potro H2H: 0-1
Juan Martin del Potro holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Martin del Potro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics fourth round 6-7(4) 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R16 | Hard | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-2 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #192 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 83 | 149 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,271 | 426 | 174 | 71.0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Juan Martin del Potro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,990 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,199 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,118 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,045 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2016 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #127 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 62–17 | 78.5% | #7 | 2,228 | 1 | 13 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,208 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,138 | 1 | 18 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,091 | 1 | 18 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #38 | 2,151 | 1 | 19 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #125 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,174 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,189 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,123 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #84 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,093 | 1 | 22 |