H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 1-0
Taro Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 6-4 7-5 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #192 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 83 | 149 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,001 | 114 | 121 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,875 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #127 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #125 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #84 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |