H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 1-0

Taro Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Taro Daniel #117 6-4 7-5 Kyle Edmund #81 Match data Aug 10, 2016* R32 Rio de Janeiro Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #160 #58 893 1,815 83 149 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,001 114 121 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel Kyle Edmund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,587 0 0
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 2016 20–19 51.3% #45 1,882 0 0
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,875 0 0
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,952 0 1
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,769 0 1
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,763 0 2
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,735 0 2
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,653 0 2
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #160 1,534 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel Kyle Edmund
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 22 18 40 55.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 21 12 33 63.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2020 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 86 134 35.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — 78 75 153 51.0% 24 27 51 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel Kyle Edmund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 4/4 4.5 2.0 64.2% 73.6% 51.0% 74.3% 14.3% 65.6% 31.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/5 5.6 2.8 61.2% 68.8% 43.4% 53.2% 11.3% 59.5% 28.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 5/6 5.2 2.8 57.8% 62.5% 47.8% 52.4% 25.3% 56.6% 32.3%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% 2016 36/39 6.2 2.9 59.3% 71.8% 51.0% 57.8% 44.0% 63.3% 35.1%
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2017 56/56 5.6 2.9 58.3% 74.7% 54.1% 61.2% 42.6% 65.9% 37.6%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2018 57/58 6.9 2.5 59.6% 75.7% 54.5% 66.1% 40.8% 67.3% 37.9%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2019 36/36 5.1 2.1 62.2% 72.0% 52.5% 51.4% 42.8% 64.7% 34.1%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% 2020 19/19 5.7 2.7 61.2% 74.4% 50.2% 68.7% 36.6% 65.0% 38.0%
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% 2022 5/5 7.2 3.4 53.3% 73.2% 39.8% 65.6% 63.3% 57.5% 33.7%
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% 2023 7/7 3.7 3.3 56.8% 63.2% 43.7% 33.7% 31.7% 54.4% 25.2%
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.0% 62.0% 54.0% 67.0% 20.0% 59.0% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227/232 3.9 2.5 62.1% 66.4% 49.4% 55.1% 40.9% 59.9% 34.9% — 230/235 5.9 2.6 59.6% 73.2% 52.1% 60.1% 40.5% 64.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel Kyle Edmund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1500 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1510 104.9 -0.84 -2.06 0.901 48.3% — — +57 22.2% -1.22 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1474 106.7 -2.93 -2.24 0.699 44.8% +38 — — 8.3% -2.50 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1587 116.6 -3.20 -1.53 0.745 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.23
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2016 1883 152.7 +0.52 -0.61 0.956 49.6% -23 -173 -355 51.6% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–4 (75%) 107.3 -0.63
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2017 1876 157.4 +2.08 +1.53 1.102 51.8% +2 -87 -353 56.3% +0.53 7–18 (28%) 13–13 (50%) 90.5 -0.39
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 +0.49 2018 1952 158.9 +3.43 +1.57 1.159 52.4% -10 -74 -299 60.5% +0.60 9–10 (47%) 14–11 (56%) 101.4 -0.07
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 +0.44 2019 1770 148.4 +0.75 -0.44 0.966 49.4% +37 +36 -119 44.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) 87.7 -0.60
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) 112.0 -0.54 2020 1764 146.7 +0.91 +1.13 1.084 51.3% +37 — — 52.1% +0.27 2–3 (40%) 3–7 (30%) 94.5 -0.14
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 98.9 +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 2022 1735 110.8 -1.90 +0.25 0.792 45.8% +26 — — 36.4% -1.09 — 1–1 — +0.12
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 +0.55 2023 1653 115.8 -3.22 -3.72 0.554 40.8% +59 +68 — 6.3% -2.75 0–1 0–1 — -1.04
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.6 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 99.3 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) 92.8 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1535 107.9 +2.20 -1.24 0.805 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1816 134.0 -2.66 -0.57 0.871 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.4% -0.80 32–44 (42%) 43–52 (45%) 96.1 -0.26 — 2002 155.4 +1.34 +0.47 1.016 50.4% +7 -64 -227 50.3% +0.06 28–46 (38%) 45–55 (45%) 88.6 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.