H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 0-1

Lukas Rosol holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2016 Australian Open first round 7-6(2) 7-5 5-7 6-7(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Taro Daniel #78 6-4 7-5 Lukas Rosol #144 Match data Jan 7, 2019 Q1 Q Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Lukas Rosol #51 7-6(2) 7-5 5-7 6-7(5) 6-1 Taro Daniel #99 Match data Jan 20, 2016* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #160 #58 893 1,815 83 149 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #160 1,534 0 1 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 48 86 134 35.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 2026 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.0% 62.0% 54.0% 67.0% 20.0% 59.0% 33.0% 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.49 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.54 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.14 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.55 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.01 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.98 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — -1.01 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52
33 2026 1535 107.9 +2.08 -1.14 0.805 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1816 134.0 -2.66 -0.56 0.871 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.4% -0.80 32–44 (42%) 43–52 (45%) 96.1 -0.26 — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.