H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Pablo Andujar H2H: 0-1
Pablo Andujar holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Andujar leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Andujar won the 2019 Gstaad fourth round 6-1 3-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2019* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Pablo Andujar | 6-1 3-6 7-6(2) | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Pablo Andujar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 |