H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Peter Polansky
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Taro Daniel vs Peter Polansky.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Polansky | #1,475 | #110 | 495 | 1,676 | 11 | 39 | 22.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Peter Polansky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #821 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #185 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #119 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |