H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Radu Albot H2H: 0-1
Radu Albot holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radu Albot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radu Albot won the 2019 Los Cabos fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2025* | BNP Paribas Open | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Radu Albot | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| May 8, 2024* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Radu Albot | 6-4 0-6 6-1 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2019* | Los Cabos | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Radu Albot | 6-1 6-2 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2018 | Auckland | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Radu Albot | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Radu Albot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |