H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Ricardas Berankis
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Taro Daniel vs Ricardas Berankis.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Ricardas Berankis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |