H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Simone Bolelli H2H: 0-1
Simone Bolelli holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2016 Marrakech third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2016* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Simone Bolelli | 7-5 6-4 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Simone Bolelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |