H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 1-0

Taro Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2014 Chile Open first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Taro Daniel #226 6-3 6-3 Thomaz Bellucci #125 Match data Feb 6, 2014* R32 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay
Thomaz Bellucci #129 7-5 6-2 Taro Daniel #238 Match data Jan 14, 2014* Q3 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #160 #58 893 1,815 83 149 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,932 182 204 47.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel Thomaz Bellucci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2008 3–12 20.0% #85 1,540 0 0
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,796 0 2
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,711 0 2
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2012 24–22 52.2% #33 1,819 0 3
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,678 0 3
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,794 0 3
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,854 0 4
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 2016 17–22 43.6% #61 1,801 0 4
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,701 0 4
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,659 0 4
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #160 1,534 0 1 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,614 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,603 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel Thomaz Bellucci
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 8 9 11.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — —
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 11 13 24 45.8% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 7 13 20 35.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — —
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2016 9 9 18 50.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 48 86 134 35.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — 64 94 158 40.5% 112 98 210 53.3% 6 12 18 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 375/386 of Thomaz Bellucci's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel Thomaz Bellucci
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 14/15 6.2 3.5 56.6% 66.0% 50.1% 52.2% 38.9% 58.5% 33.6%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% 2009 35/35 6.7 2.6 61.2% 71.4% 51.4% 58.0% 37.9% 63.5% 34.5%
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2010 55/56 7.2 2.8 58.2% 71.4% 50.2% 56.7% 43.0% 62.5% 37.8%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2011 47/47 6.3 2.7 61.1% 71.6% 49.9% 57.9% 40.4% 63.2% 37.7%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2012 44/46 5.8 2.8 56.5% 70.7% 52.6% 57.2% 41.6% 62.7% 38.2%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% 2013 22/23 6.1 3.5 54.3% 68.1% 51.0% 54.2% 33.5% 60.6% 34.8%
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% 2014 28/29 6.8 3.3 56.3% 73.0% 51.8% 60.0% 47.9% 63.8% 36.6%
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% 2015 56/56 5.9 3.5 58.5% 72.0% 52.7% 60.2% 39.5% 63.9% 38.3%
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% 2016 34/39 4.8 4.1 56.8% 68.9% 51.4% 53.6% 43.7% 61.3% 38.2%
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% 2017 32/32 4.9 4.3 58.3% 67.2% 51.6% 49.6% 45.3% 60.8% 36.8%
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% 2018 6/6 4.2 3.3 59.0% 68.8% 49.0% 57.0% 45.5% 60.7% 40.2%
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.0% 62.0% 54.0% 67.0% 20.0% 59.0% 33.0% 2021 1/1 3.0 3.0 60.9% 59.5% 44.4% 33.3% 11.1% 53.6% 34.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 0.0 3.0 53.5% 55.3% 51.5% 62.5% 0.0% 53.5% 25.0%
Career — 227/232 3.9 2.5 62.1% 66.4% 49.4% 55.1% 40.9% 59.9% 34.9% — 375/386 6.1 3.2 58.1% 70.5% 51.3% 56.5% 41.2% 62.4% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel Thomaz Bellucci
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1485 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1541 122.5 -1.95 -2.46 0.810 46.6% -85 +113 — 34.1% -1.14 0–5 (0%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.12
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2009 1782 138.6 +0.15 -2.07 0.944 49.0% -61 -3 — 50.0% -0.28 6–5 (55%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.66
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2010 1797 150.7 -0.44 +1.56 1.007 50.0% -63 +117 -167 54.1% +0.16 13–10 (57%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.82
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.49 2011 1711 145.3 +0.83 +0.14 1.023 50.1% -61 +227 -72 48.4% -0.07 11–11 (50%) 11–13 (46%) — +2.85
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 2012 1819 150.8 +0.10 +1.17 1.023 50.4% -118 +145 — 51.3% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.64
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.54 2013 1679 127.7 -1.87 -1.99 0.883 47.7% -32 +132 — 36.2% -0.97 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.53
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.14 2014 1794 144.9 +0.75 -0.17 1.011 50.2% -16 +20 — 49.3% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 2015 1855 155.7 +0.52 +2.08 1.061 50.9% -84 +107 — 50.4% +0.01 11–10 (52%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.93
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.55 2016 1801 145.0 -1.11 +1.56 0.986 49.7% -29 +10 -201 44.1% -0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.79
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.01 2017 1702 134.5 -3.07 +0.19 0.937 48.6% -1 +51 — 39.8% -0.67 5–8 (38%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.46
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.98 2018 1660 117.8 -0.83 -0.48 1.024 50.4% — +58 — 38.9% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.14
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — -1.01 2019 1628 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1535 107.9 +2.06 -1.39 0.805 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 2021 1614 102.4 -1.27 +1.41 0.740 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1603 103.9 +1.78 -2.27 0.538 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03
Career — 1816 134.0 -2.66 -0.57 0.871 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.4% -0.80 32–44 (42%) 43–52 (45%) 96.1 -0.26 — 1933 149.6 -0.36 +0.43 0.987 49.7% -63 +93 -139 47.2% -0.22 70–83 (46%) 89–86 (51%) 100.1 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.