H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 0-1
Yen-Hsun Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2017 Tokyo third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2017* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-1 6-3 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Taro Daniel | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |