H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Tatsuma Ito vs Di Wu H2H: 0-1
Di Wu holds a 1–0 lead over Tatsuma Ito in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Di Wu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Di Wu won the 2019 Zhuhai third round 3-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2019* | Zhuhai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Di Wu | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tatsuma Ito | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |