H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tatsuma Ito vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 0-1
Malek Jaziri holds a 1–0 lead over Tatsuma Ito in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Malek Jaziri leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Malek Jaziri won the 2015 Indian Wells Masters first round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2015* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Malek Jaziri | 7-5 6-1 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malek Jaziri | #1,645 | #42 | 1,042 | 1,843 | 83 | 134 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatsuma Ito | Malek Jaziri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #98 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #45 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #201 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #312 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #433 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1645 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |